NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number CL-19909
Irwin M. Lieberman, Referee
(Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and Steamship Clerks,
( Freight Handlers, Express and Station Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Southern Railway Company
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood (GL-7146)
that:
(a) Carrier violated the Clerks' Agreement at Atlanta, Georgia, when
two excepted positions were established in the Office of Manager, Capital Account.
ing, and the occupants of these positions being assigned duties formerly performed
by schedule clerical employes.
(b) Carrier be required to compensate Claimants Mr. W. S. Potts, Mrs.
S. 0. Boston and Mrs. L. I. Powell for $1,635.00 per month to be equally divided
among them. This being the combined salaries of Mr. R. A. Waller and Mr. C. A.
Farr, occupants of the two excepted positions.
(c) Carrier violated the Clerks' Agreement at Atlanta, Georgia, when
Abolishment Bulletin No. 1 was issued by Mr. L. 0. Todd, Jr., Manager, Capital
Accounting, abolishing the position of Clerk assigned to Mr. M. W. Foster,
account schedule clerical work formerly performed by him being assigned to and
performed by the occupants of the two excepted positions.
(d) Carrier be required to restore the position formerly held by
Mr. M. W. Foster and restore the work to that position.
OPINION OF BOARD: The record indicates that an official position of Tax
Accountant was established in Carrier's Capital Accounting
Office in November 1969. Effective June 1, 1970, two additional Tax Accountant
positions were established and filled in that office. Petitioner contends that
the latter two positions should have been established as scheduled positions
covered by the Agreement, since they were assigned duties formerly performed
by schedule clerical employees.
The Carrier contends that the monetary portion of the claim is barred
because the claim was not filed within sixty days from the date the first Tax
Accountant position was established in November 1969. We do not agree. The
occurrence giving rise to the claim was the establishment of the two additional
Tax Accountant positions effective June 1, 1970. The claim was filed within
sixty days from that date. The contention of the Carrier in this respect is
without proper basis and is rejected.
Award Number 19894 Page 2
Docket Number CL-19909
As to the merits of the dispute, there is no agreement restriction
upon the number of official positions that may be established by the Carrier.
In the application of a general type scope rule, it is well settled that officials, whether the posi
the handling on the property the Carrier denied that the occupants of the Tax
Accountant positions performed work reserved to positions covered by the
Agreement.
The Scope Rule of the Agreement involved herein has been interpreted
in a number of decisions of this Board (Awards 14075, 15890, 16934, 19339,
19340) as being generalin nature, not defining the work covered by the Agreement. Under this Scope R
if it lays claim to certain work, to prove that by tradition, custom and
practice, such work is reserved to employees covered by the Agreement. In
this case the Petitioner has failed to meet that burden.
In the handling of the dispute on the property, the Petitioner's
representative stated:
" . our February 17, 1969 Section Six Notice could take
care of this".
This statement recognized that the issue in the case was one for negotiation
rather than interpretation of the present agreement. It is well recognized
that this Board has no authority to rewrite the rules.
Based upon the entire record, we find that the Petitioner has failed
to meet the required burden of proof and the claim will therefore be denied.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, after giving the parties
to this dispute due notice of hearing thereon, and upon the whole
record and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are
respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act,
as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein; and
~~'i
a,y,4-~1
Award Number 19894 Page 3
Docket Number CL-19909
That the Agreement was not violated.
A W A R D
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
/
00
By Order of Third Division
ATTEST:
I`~
Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 8th day of August 1973.