NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number CL-20045
Frederick R. Blackwell, Referee
(Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and Steamship Clerks,
( Freight Handlers, Express and Station Employees
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(The Central Railroad Company of New Jersey
( (R. D. Timpany, Trustee)
STATEMENT OF CLAIM
: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood (GL-7206)
that:
(a) Carrier violated the Clerks' Agreement, particular reference
to Rule No. 37, when they disqualified Mr. E. Hursey from position of Checker,
Terminal area, following a hearing and investigation held on October 21, 1971,
and
(b) Carrier shall be required to compensate Mr. E. Hursey a day's pay
for October 22, 1971 and each subsequent day he is withheld from assignment as
Checker, Terminal Area, and
(c) Carrier shall be required to clear Mr. E. Hursey's record of all
alleged charges or allegations which may have been recorded thereon, as a result
of the alleged violation named herein.
OPINION OF BOARD
: This dispute originally involved a claim for reversal of a
Carrier disqualification decision and for compensation for
time lost. The claim as presented to the Board involves a claim for compensa
tion only.
Following a hearing held on October 21, 1971, at which the Claimant
cas represented by his duly accredited representative, pursuant to the Clerks'
Agreement, the Carrier found Claimant guilty of charges of "failing to carry
out instructions of Yardmaster and poor performance of duty while Checker, Yard
'B', Elizabethport Yard on October 15, 1971, 6:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m." Based on
this finding of guilt the Carrier took action to disqualify Claimant as Checker,
effective October 22, 1971. The Carrier's action was appealed by the Organization by letter dated No
monetary loss. The Claimant's disqualification was further appealed to the Carrier's Vice President-
wrote as follows to the General Chairman:
"Your file 1170-993:288, claiming one day's pay commencing
October 22, 1971., on behalf of Elijah Hursey.
We are agreeable to lift the disqualification assessed by
Superintendent Nelson, effective October 22, 1971, on appeal
under Rule 37(h), and his record will be so noted.
It is agreed request for compensation is withdrawn by the
organization."
Award Number 20063 Page 2
Docket Number CL-20045
In a reply letter dated April 21, 1972, the General Chairman advised
as follows:
"The last sentence of the letter, reading - 'It is agreed request
for compensation is withdrawn by the Organization.' is not correct.
During conference on the claim, held on February 23, 1972, you advised that you were willing to remo
stated that you were not willing to allow compensation as claim
for compensation had not been timely filed on the local level. We
understood what you were saying, but did not withdraw request for
compensation, expecting that your conference position would be
stated in your reply to the claim.
We will appreciate your correcting the error in order that the
record will properly state the reason for non allowance of compensation,"
The Carrier made no objection to revisi.Lg the record as requested by the General
Chairman.
From the foregoing, and the whole record, we conclude that Claimant's
disqualification was lifted by Carrier as a result of conference at the highest
is
level of appeal. Consequently, paragraphs (a) and (c) of the Statement of Clair
are dismissed as moot.
With respect to paragraph (b) of the Statement of Claim, we believe
the Carrier's contention that the compensation claim was not timely made is well
taken and should be sustained. It was only on appeal that the claim for compensation was advanced by
This was not done in this case. Therefore, we shall dismiss paragraph (b) as
asserting a claim which has not been handled on the property in compliance with
Article V of the Time Limits rule.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record
and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Fmployes involved in this dispute are
respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act,
as approved June 21, 1934;
Award Number 20063 Page 3
Docket Number CL-20045
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein; and
The claim is dismissed in accordance with the Opinion.
A W A R D
Claim dismissed as per Opinion.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
AO)
Ak4Z~t
By Order of Third Division
ATTEST:
Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 14th day of December 1973.