(Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and Steamship Clerks,
( Freight Handlers, Express and Station Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Boston and Maine Corporation



1. The Carrier violated the Rules Agreement effective September 1, 1952 as amended and the National Agreement dated February 25, 1971, when on April 12, 1971 it abolished Clerk-Cashier position at North Adams, Mass. and assigned all of the work to the Agent, an employe outside the Class and Craft of the Agreement. Further violation occurred when on May 1, 1971 they reassigned the preparation of charges, rating and routing and other related functions to clerical employees in another seniority district.

2. Carrier shall now be required to pay Donald 0. Belleau, Clerk, North Adams, Mass., for all wage losses, including subsequent fringe benefits, insurance premium payments, vacation credits, holidays and interest compounded at 6% continuous from April 12, 1971 to such time, when all work is restored to the Clerical Class and Craft within its original seniority district, subject to compliance with p
OPINION OF BOARD: There is in existence on this property an Agreement known as
Decision CL-46 which became effective on March 23, 1959.
Article I of that Agreement revised Rule I of the General Rules Agreement and
provides in pertinent part as follows:







                    Docket Number CL-19799


            " or other supervisory employe, provided that less than four hours' work per day of the abolished position or positions remains to be performed; and further provided that such work is incident to the duties of such Agent, Ticket Agent, Ticket Seller, Yardmaster, Foreman, or other supervisory employe.


            (3) Work incident to and directly attached to the primary duties of another class or craft such as preparation of time cards, rendering statements, or reports in connection with the performance of duty, tickets collected, cars carried in trains, and cars inspected or duties of a similar character, may be performed by employes of such other craft or class.


            (4) Performance of work by employees other than those covered by this agreement in accordance with paragraphs (2) and (3) of this Rule 1 (f) will not constitute a vio- lation of any provisions of this agreement." (Emphasis supplied.)


A joint check of the records on the property failed to prove a violation of the Agreement as alleged in the claim. Organization failed to satisfy its burden of proof. Consequently, Section (f) (4) of Decision CL-46, supra, is dispositive of the issue raised by the Claim. We, therefore, will dismiss the claim for lack of proof.

        FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds and holds:


        That the parties waived oral hearing;


That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;

That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and

        The claim fails for lack of proof.


                      A W A R D


        Claim dismissed.


                            NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD

                            By Order of Ghird Division


ATTEST:
        Exectutive Secretary


Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 14th day of December 1973.