(Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen
jimTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul and Pacific Railroad Company

STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the General Committee of the Brotherhood of Rail
road Signalmen on the Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul and
Pacific Railroad Company:

On behalf of Signal Helper D. A. Entwistle for $6.60 expense reim6bursement for the month of April 1
OPINION OF BOARD: This dispute involves the same parties, same basic issues
and same Agreement as in Award No. 20094. For the
reasons stated in that Award, the claim is dismissed as discussed in that Opinion.





That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;

That this Division of the Adjustment Board has ,jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and








                            By Order of Third Division


ATTEST: (V/ t~
        ~xecutive Secretary


Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 11th day of January 1974.
        Dissent to Awards Nos. 20094, 20095, 20096rand 20097,

        Dockets Nos. :G-19530, SG-19531, SG-19540 -and S.-14746


The Msjority has made a play on semantics to dismiss these claims. We hold that the meaning and intent of the option exercised is quite clear and that it should have been applied accordingly.

    Awards Nos. 20094, 20095, 20096 and 20097 being in error, I dissent.


                                    W. W. Altus, Jr.

                                    Labor Member C