NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number SG-19853
Joseph A. Sickles, Referee
(Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(George P. Baker, Richard C. Bond, Jervis Langdon,
( Jr.,and Willard Wirtz, Trustees of the Property
( of Penn Central Transportation Company, Debtor
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the General Committee of the Brotherhood
of Railroad Signalmen on the Penn Central Trans
portation Company (former New York Central Railroad Company-Lines West
of Buffalo):
Claim No. 1.
In favor of leading Signal Maintainer F. J. Quada for six (6)
hours' pay at the pro rata rate for January 25, 1971; such claim account
Signal Foreman G. E. Schray violated the Scope Rule of the current working
agreement when
he performed work of assisting Signal Maintainer
F. J. Lackowitz in removing from
service automatic
train stop inductors
at Chelsea, Michigan, and adjacent area on the assigned maintenance
section of Maintainer Lackowitz.
Claim No. 2.
In favor of Signal Maintainer Test A. J. Smith for six (6)
hours' pay at the pro rata rate for January 26, 1971, such claim account
Signal Foreman G. E. Schray violated the Scope Rule of the current working agreement when he perform
F. J. Lackowitz in removing from service automatic train stop inductors
at Chelsea, Michigan, and adjacent area on the assigned maintenance section of Maintainer Lackowitz.
OPINION OF BOARD: Organization bases its claim on the use of a Signal
Maintenance Foreman to assist a Signal Maintainer on
two days in January, 1971, concerning removal of Automotive Train Stop
Inductors.
We have reviewed the record in its entirety, and note that
Carrier
relies upon
Award 17706 (Yagoda). Based upon the record as a
whole, and considering the facts presented here, we are inclined to
agree that Award 17706 disposes of the issue.
For the reasons stated in the above cited Award, we will
deny the claim.
Award Number 20248 Page 2
Docket Number SG-19853
7T'1ET"rS:
Tire 'Third Division of the Adjustment hoard, upon the
whole record and all the evidsnce, finds and holds;
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and tie E-?loves involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes
the Railway Labor act, as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has Jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; an
That the Agreement was not violated.
A ?' :1 R
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJt1.;^·.7Nr
xnaRn
By Order of Third Division
ATTEST:
.ecut:ve Secretary
' Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 17th day of `lay 1974.