Mr. G. M. Gunter, seven and one-half (7 1/2) hours - 9:30 a.m. to 5:00 P.M.

                                    Mr. W. R. Davis, seven and one-half (7 1/2) hours - 9:30 a.m. to 5:00 P.M.


                                    Mr. H. M. Huffstettler, seven and one-half (7 1/2) hours - 9:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.

                                    Mr. J. Dunn, six and one-half (6 1/2) hours - 10:30 a. m. to 5:00 P.M.

                                    Mr. J. Smith, six and one-half (6 1/2) hours - 10:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.

                                    Mr. M. Waits, seven and one-half (7 1/2) hours - 9:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.

                                    Mr. W. Troyer, seven and one-half (7 1/2) hours - 9:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.

                                    Mr. L. Blankenship, six and one-half (6 1/2) hours - 10:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.

                                    Mr. L. Holmes, six and one-half (6 1/2) hours - 10:30 a.m. to 5:00 P.M.

                                    Mr. J. Gawder, seven and one-half (7 1/2) hours - 9:30 a.m. to 5:00 P.M.

                                    Mr. L. Cary, seven and one-half (7 1/2) hours - 9:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.

                                    Mr. C. Burgdorf, six and one-half (6 1/2) hours - 10:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.

                                      Mr. W. T. Gangler, seven and one-half (7 1/2) hours - 9:30 a.m. to 5:00 P.M.

                        Mr. E. Grant, seven and one-half (7 1/2) hours - 9:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. s

                        /Carrier's, File: SIG 148-208/

                Award Number 20418 Page 2

                Docket Number SG-20279


OPINION OF BOARD: The issue involved in this dispute, concerning the
assignment of overtime, is whether the employes in the
Sacramento Signal Shop of Carrier constitute a "gang" within the meaning
of Rule 13 of the Agreement.

The question herein has been decided in Awards 19920 and 20416 which are controlling. We concur with the opinions expressed therein.

        FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds and holds:


        That the parties waived oral hearing;


That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;

That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction aver the dispute involved herein; and

        That the Agreement was not violated.


                      A W A R D


        Claim denied.


                        NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD

                        By Order of Third Division


        ATTEST: Executive Secretary


Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 27th day of September 1974.

I

I