(Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and Steamship
( Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express and
( Station Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Western Weighing and Inspection Bureau









OPINION OF HOARD: The Organization contends that the Bureau violated
and continues to violate Rules 6, 9 and 12 of the
current Clerks' Agreement when it refused to permit the Claimant to
exercise displacement rights on Position No. 304, held by a junior
employe.

The Bureau maintains that it has not violated the Agreement and that it has treated the Claimant in a fair and equitable manner.

Claimant Santillan exercised his displacement rights on Position 304, entitled "Inspector", held by a junior employe. The Bureau's District Manager administered tests to help determine the Claimant's fitness and ability to perform the duties of Position No. 304. On one test the Claimant answered one out of sixteen questions, without any correct answers. On the other test Claimant answered thirteen questions out of twenty-one, with three answers out of twenty-one correct.



detailed and at times complicated reports and on numerous occasions, the Inspector is required to determine percentages, as well as make and report



numerous measurements which means he must have some fundamental knowledge of basic arithmetic. One of the tests given to the Claimant is composed of basic arithmetic problems and has been given to all potential employes entering the Transit Department of the Bureau in the Kansas City District.

It is important to note, notwithstanding the tests and results, that the Claimant offers no evidence whatsoever of his adequate fitness and ability for Position No. 304.

Notwithstanding the tests and results, the Bureau's District Manager made two separate efforts to place Claimant on Position No. 304 for a week under the tutelage and guidance of the Chief Inspector, so that the Claimant could demonstrate his potential to fulfill the duties of Position 304. This offer was later broadened so that the General Chairman of the Organization would have an equal voice in determining the fitness and ability potential of the Claimant. These offers were rejected.







That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved JUne 21, 1934;

That this Division of the Adjustment Hoard has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and





        Claim denied.


                          NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT HOARD

                          By Order of Third Division


ATTEST. a
          Executive Secretary


Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 27th day of September 1974.