NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number CL-20437
(Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and Steamship
( Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express and
( Station Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul and Pacific Railroad
( Company
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood
(GL-7371) that:
1) Carrier violated the Clerks' Rules Agreement at Milwaukee,
Wisconsin when it required employe L. Bintz to work Road
Caller Position No. 09590 under protest.
2) Carrier shall compensate employe L. Bintz at the penalty
rate of Position No. 09470 for May
16,
17, 18, 19, 20 and 23,
1972.
OPINION OF BOARD: The Claimant became the regular assigned occupant
of Road Caller Position 09590 as of May 8, 1972.
Prior to May 8, 1972 the Claimant had requested to work a temporary
vacancy occurring on Position 09470 -- Assistant Chief Clerk. The
request was granted and he was assigned to work Position 09470
effective may 8, 1972: he was awarded the temporary vacancy on
Position 09470 by bulletin on May 15, 1972. On May
16,
1972 the
Carrier removed the Claimant from Position 09470 and required him to
work the Road Caller Position 09590 on the dates of the claim. The
Claimant worked Position 09590 under protest.
The Carrier contends that the claim presented to its Vice
President-Labor Relations was not the same claim filed with the
Assistant Superintendent and appealed to and denied by its Superintendent and is thus barred under R
Carrier's perception in this regard is a technical one which we must
reject. The Carrier's position was not prejudiced in any way in the
processing of this claim. The Claimant's time slips, which are the
basis of this claim, state: "CLAIM PENALTY TIME -- WORKING POS. 09590
UNDER PROTEST -- FORCED OFF POS. 09470 BY THE CARRIER". The claim
presented to the Vice President-Labor Relations and now before this
Board is based on the Carrier's requiring the Claimant to work Road
Caller Pas. No. 09590, under protest; and the Claimant seeks redress
for the alleged Agreement violation at the penalty rate for the
position he was removed from for the dates in question.
Award Number 20575 Page 2
Docket Number CL-20437
Concerning the merits of the case, the pertinent rules
involved in this dispute are quoted below:
"RULE
9
- BULLETINED POSITIONS
(f) Bulletined positions filled temporarily pending
an assignment, shall be filled by the senior qualified
employe requesting the position.
(g) New positions or vacancies of thirty (30) days or
less duration shall be considered as temporary and may
be filled by an employe without bulletining; if filled,
the senior qualified employe requesting same will be
assigned thereto.
(h) When an employe is assigned to a temporary vacancy
the position formerly held will be considered a temporary vacancy. If, prior to the expiration of th
temporary vacancy, the employe is disqualified or
desires to give up such vacancy, or when the temporary
vacancy expires, he will return to his former position
provided senior employe has not exercised displacement
rights thereon, or exercise seniority rights to any
positions bulletined during the period he occupied the
temporary vacancy. All employes affected by his return
will do likewise."
"MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT
2. In the application of the first paragraph of Rule
9(h) when a regularly assigned employe is assigned
in accordance with Paragraph 1 above, such employe,
unless disqualified, must remain on that position
for the duration of the vacancy or until the position is bulletined and assigned either as a tempora
return to his former position, provided senior
employe has not exercised displacement rights
thereon, or exercise seniority rights to any
position occupied by a junior employe bulletined
during the period he occupied the temporary vacancy,
except when an employe is assigned to the temporary
vacancy, and works that position for any five (5)
consecutive work days and is therefore entitled to
Award Number 20575 Page
3
Docket Number CL-20437
"the rest days of that position, he will be required to take those rest days before returning
to his former position or exercising seniority.
All employes affected by his return will do
likewise.
This agreement will be identified as 'Memorandum
of Agreement No. 71 and is effective March 1, 1971.'"
Memorandum No. 71, paragraph 2 clearly requires that (unless disqualified)
when an employe is assigned to a temporary vacancy, then he must be allowed
to remain on that vacancy for the duration of the vacancy. The purpose
of Rule 9(f)(g) and (h) is to allow the senior qualified employe the
valuable right to select higher rated positions on a temporary basis.
The Claimant in this case was not disqualified and should have been
allowed to remain on the position which was assigned to him by bulletin.
The Carrier's contention, structured on rights inherent in
Rule 17 of the Agreement, that no qualified employe was available to
relieve the Claimant at his regular assignment is contrary to the record
established on the property.
We find that the Agreement has been violated and we thus will
sustain the claim. Since the Carrier has compensated the Claimant at
the straight time rate of Position 09590, based on its view of the claim,
we shall subtract such payment from the amount due Claimant under this
award.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Hoard, upon the whole
record and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute
are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway
Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Hoard has jurisdiction
over the dispute involved herein; and
That the Agreement was violated.
Award Number 20575 Page 4
Docket Number CL-20437
A W A R D
Claim sustained as per opinion.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT HOARD
By Order of Third Division
A-TEST:
Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 30th day of December 1974,
CARRIER MEMBERS' DISSENT TO AWARD 20575, DOCKET CL-20437
(Referee Twomey)
We dissent. The matters of record which clearly establish this
claim is invalid are discussed in the memorandum submitted by the
Carrier Members. That memorandum is retained in the Master File and by
reference is incorporated in this dissent.
Mr. Naylor
Mr. Braidwood
Mr. Carter
i
~Mf. Euker
i?---:_--~--..~
i