NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number CL-20728
Irwin M. Lieberman, Referee
(Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and Steamship
( Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express and Station
Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(The Belt Railway Company of Chicago
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood (GL-
7564) that:
1. The Carrier violated the effective Clerks' Agreement when it
dismissed Clerk Warren R. Chilton from service, effective March 9, 1973.
2. That Clerk Chilton be reinstated to the service of the Carrier with seniority and all other r
of the charge.
3. That Clerk Chilton shall now be compensated for any and all
wage loss suffered as the result of his dismissal from Carrier service
retroactive to March 9, 1973. _
OPINION OF BOARD; This is a discipline case involving Claimant's dis-
missal from service after he was charged with violation of Company rules for his unauthorized po
Carrier's property.
Petitioner first raises certain procedural issues including a
contention that the notice of hearing did not contain a clear and precise
charge. We find the contention with respect to the charge to be without ,.
merit since the notice served on Claimant was sufficient to fully appr;se
him of the nature of the offense charged and thus to enable him to pre
pare his defense. After careful examination of the transcript and the
entire record of this dispute, we find that Claimant's right to due pro
cess and all other rights guaranteed him by the Agreement were properly
accorded him throughout the handling of this dispute.
The transcript of the investigation contains substantial evidence to support the conclusion that
made by Carrier. In view of the seriousness of the offense and the
evidence establishing Claimant's guilt, we do not find that the penalty
of dismissal was excessive or arbitrary.
Award Number 20603 page 2
Docket Number CL-20728
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole
record and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employee involved in this dispute are
respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor
Act, as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over
the dispute involved herein; and
That the Agreement was not violated.
A W A R D
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSMW BOARD
By Order of Third Division
ATTEST: i
Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 31st day of January 1975.