NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number CL-20460
Frederick R. Blackwell, Referee
(Brotherhood of Railway and Steamship Clerks,
( Freight Handlers, Express and Station Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(The Belt Railway Company of Chicago
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood
The Carrier violated the current National Vacation and Holiday
Agreements, when it refused to properly compensate Clerk J. Slowinski for
the Memorial Day Holiday, May 29, 1972 while off on vacation and the hoiiday occurring on a work day
on the holiday.
2. The Carrier shall now compensate J. Slowinski for eight (8)
hours' pay, at the pro rata rate of his regularly assigned position in
addition to the amount already received.
OPINION OF BOARD: This holiday pay dispute arises from a situation in
which the Claimant's position was worked on a holiday
that fell on one of his assigned work days while he was on vacation. The
Carrier paid the Claimant the equivalent of twenty (20) hours at straight
time; this total includes eight hours straight time for the Claimant's
holiday pay for Memorial Day, while the remaining twelve hours at straight
time equates with the amount that the Carrier paid to fill his job which
was eight hours at time and one-half. The Employees' contend that the
proper pay was twenty-eight (28) hours at straight time comprised of the
following:
- ___ - _ -Eight (8) hours straight time for the vacation day;
Eight (8) hours straight time for the holiday falling
on one of his vacation days; and
Eight (8) hours time and one-half (12 hours straight time)
because his position was worked on the holiday.
The difference between the two pay methods is that the Carrier believes
that it is not obligated to pay vacation pay for a vacation day that falls
on a holiday.
The basic facts are not in dispute. The Claimant was a regularly
assigned Train Clerk, Friday through Tuesday with rest days of Wednesday and
Thursday.His scheduled vacation was for the period May 29 to June 4, 1972.
_I
Award Number 20608 page 2
Docket Number CL-20460
The Memorial Day Holiday fell on May 29, Monday, which was one of his
regularly assigned work days, and his position was worked on that date.
The narrow issue thus raised is whether the facts concerning May 29,
1972, required him to be paid the equivalent of twenty (20) or twentyeight (28) hours at straight ti
The Carrier asserts that twenty (20) hours is the same amount
the Claimant would have received had he not been on vacation on the subject holiday and consequently
with the text of Article 7(a) of the National Vacation Agreement which
states that: " ..an employee having a regular assignment will be paid
while on vacation the daily compensation paid by the Carrier for such
assignment." The Employees' position is that their claim for twentyeight (28) hours is supported by
Organization and Mr. J. W. Oxam, Chairman of the Eastern Carrier's Conference Committee.
We are satisfied that the Employees' position is sound and that
extensive discussion of the Agreement provisions is not necessary. Article
III, Section 7(a) of the January 1, 1968 Agreement (new Section 7, to Article II of the Agreement of
any recognized holiday falls during an hourly or daily rated employee's
vacation period, "he shall, in addition to his vacation compensation, receive
the holiday nay provided therein provided he meets the qualification requirements specified." (E
tively so, by the Lowry-Oram correspondence which reads as follows:
A. R. Lowry Letter of May 6. 1970
SUBJECT: National Vacation and Holiday Agreements
Under our current National Vacation and Holiday Agreements if an employee is off on vacation and
on a work day of the employee's work week and the position
works the holiday, to what compensation is the vacationing
employee entitled for that holiday?
J. W. Oram Letter of May 25. 1970
Referring to your May 6th letter, Subject: National
Vacation and Holiday Agreements, reading as follows:
.l.
Award Number 20608 Page 3
Docket Number CL-20460
"Under our current National Vacation and Holiday
Agreements if an employee is off on vacation and a holiday occurs on a work day of the employee's wo
the position works the holiday, to what compensation is
the vacationing employee entitled for that holiday?"
Under the cited circumstances, assuming that he met the
qualification requirements, such an employee would be eligible
for eight hours for the vacation day, eight hours for the holiday falling on one of his vacation day
time and one-half rate, or twelve hours, because his position
was required to be worked on the holiday, or a total of twentyeight hours.
The Carrier notes that Mr. Oram makes no mention of any "specific
provision" which supports his opinion, but the Carrier does not dispute the
substantive import or accuracy of the opinion. The Board notes that Mr. Oram,
as Chairman of the Eastern Carriers' Conference Committee, executed the January 1, 1968 National Agr
issue in this dispute. Moreover, since the opinion which Mr. Oram rendered
in his May 25, 1970 letter is patently against the economic interests of the
Conference of Carriers, we can scarcely conceive of a more significant statement in support of the E
Vacation and Holiday Agreements.
In view of the foregoing, and on the whole record, we shall sustain
the claim.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record
and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are
respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor
Act, as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction
over the dispute involved herein; and
Award Number 20608 Page 4
Docket Number CL-20460
That the Agreement was violated.
A W A R D
Claim sustained.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
ATTEST: LG i , ~// J
Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 21st day of February 1975.