(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes PARTIES TO DISPUTE: (Norfolk and Western Railway Company



(1) The dismissal of Laborers G. W. Harper and L. J. Copley on August 20, 1973 was without just and sufficient cause and on the basis of unproven charges (System File MW-PO-73-100).

(2) Laborer L. J. Copley be reimbursed for all monetary loss suffered from August 20, 1973 to February 25, 1974.

(3) Laborer G. W. Harper be restored to service, his record cleared, seniority and all other rights unimpaired and reimbursement be made for all time lost from date of dismissal to date of restoration to service, all in accordance with Rule 32 (c).

OPINION OF BOARD: The rule is well established that an employe is
required to carry out his assigned duties, even when
he feels aggrieved. The corollary to this rule, couched as an exception,
grants an employe the right to abstain from executing an assignment when
confronted by an immediate danger to himself, property, or the public.
However, in the instant dispute, there was no valid justification for
the conduct of the claimants on the morning of August 20, 1973 in will
fully disregarding the orders of their supervisors. This act of insub
ordination was of such a nature as to justify the dismissal of these
employes from service.





That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;

That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and










                    ' By Order of Third Division


ATTEST: ~J'~ .
Executive Secretary

Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 21st day of March 1975.