NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number CL-20708
William M. Edgett, Referee
(Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and Steamship
( Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express and
( Station Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Pacific Fruit Express Company
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood
(GL-7612) that:
1. The Pacific Fruit Express Company violated the Agreement
on November 15, 1972, when it notified J. H. Trujillo that he was automatically, considered out of s
of the reason he advanced for not wishing to respond to the employer's
recall notice.
2. J. H. Trujillo shall now be allowed eight (8) hours pay
each work day at the pro rata rate of Iceman commencing November 15,
1972, and continuing until his seniority rights are properly restored.
OPINION OF BOARD: On October
4,
1972, Carrier sent Claimant a proper
"Notice of Recall to Duty", Claimant being the senior
furloughed, unassigned employee on the seniority district. Claimant failed
to report for duty, and as a reason for doing so he stated that he wanted
to remain with his family.
On November 15, 1972, Carrier's Superintendent advised Claimant
that under the provisions of Rule 13 (d) of the controlling agreement he
was automatically considered out of service because of his failure to report and the unsatisfactory
(d), then in effect, reads:
"13(d) An employe failing to return to service on a
regular or bulletined position for which he has requisite seniority and is qualified, within fifteen
(15) days after being notified (by certified mail or
telegram sent to last address furnished by employe)
or give satisfactory reason for not doing so will be
considered out of service."
Since Claimant neither returned to service nor offered satisfactory reason for his failure to do so,
rights under the provisions of Rule 13 (d). Awards 5799 (Carter),
10404 (Mitchell), 12993 (Hall), 20672 (Edgett).
Award Number 20678 Page 2
Docket Number CL-20708
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole
record and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are
respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor
Act, as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over
the dispute involved herein; and
That the Agreement was not violated.
A W A R D
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT
BOARD
By Order of Third Division
ATTEST:
~X4
~~/
Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 17th day of April 1975.