NATIONAL RAILROAD
ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number MS-20734
Francis X. Quinn, Referee
(United Steelworkers of America
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(The Lake Terminal Railroad Company
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Please be advised that I wish to file an ex parte
submission to the Board on an issue which has been
discussed through the various stages of the grievance procedure, up to
and including the Director of Labor Relations of the Lake Terminal Railroad Company, Mr. E. J. Parki
The issue is designated as Claim M.W. 6-73. It concerns a Claim
that equipment belonging to the Maintenance of Way Department is being operated by employees of the
OPINION OF BOARD: Because of a breakdown of the Car Shop Car Crane on July
23, 24, 25, 26, 27 and 30, 1973, the Carrier utilized a
Speedswiag Machine assigned to the Maintenance of Way Department to perform
Car Department work in the Car.Shop.
The Speedswing Machine, on above dates, was operated by Claimant,
a qualified operator of the Maintenance of Way Department, on the 7:00 A.M.
to 3:00 P.M. shift. On the 3:00 P.M. to 11:00 P.M. shift the Speedswing
Machine was operated by a Car Repairman of the Car Repair Department.
Petitioner contends the operating of the Speedswing Machine is
work by mutual agreement exclusively assigned to employes of the Maintenance
of Way Department regardless of the character of work performed. On the other
hand, Carrier contends the assignment of a Car Repairman to operate the Speedswing Machine when perf
The Board has consistently followed a well established principle
that the character of the work performed by a machine would determine the
craft from which its operator was drawn. See Awards 4546, 4547, 13517, 14004,
19038, 19542 and Second Division Awards 244, 1829, 3405.
Since car repair work under Rule 14, Section 4 (d) was performed,
we feel it is logical that operation of the Speedswing Machine in connection
with such work also belonged to Car Department forces and the assignment of
an employe therefrom was proper. We deny the claim.
Notice was given to the United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO
District 28 as representative of Third Party - Carmen. This Board has fully
considered their contentions.
I
Award Number 20703 Page 2
Docket Number MS-20734
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole
record and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are
respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor
Act, as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over
the dispute involved herein; and
That the Agreement was not violated.
A W A R D
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
ATTEST:~i
~~
0%04-~
Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 17th day of April 1975.