(Moses Ruffin, Ind. & on behalf of others
( similarly situated
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(George P. Baker, Robert W. Blanchette, and Richard
( C. Bond, Trustees of the Property of
( Penn Central Transportation Company, Debtor

STATEMENT OF CLAIM: This is to serve notice, as required by the rules of
the National Railroad Adjustment Board, of my inten
tion to file an ex parte submission on January 15, 1974 covering an unad
justed dispute between my clients, Moses Ruffin, Individually and on be
half of others similarly situated, and The Penn Central Transportation
Company, involving the question:



OPINION OF BOARD: The record is clear the claim the Petitioner is
attempting to assert before the Board has not been
handled on the property in accordance with Rule 7-B-1, of the Agreement
of May 1, 1942, nor the requirements of Section 3 First (i) of the Rail
way Labor Act or Circular 1 of the National Railroad Adjustment Board.
In addition, no conference was ever held on this property prior to sub
mission of the dispute to this Board in conformity with Section 2 First,
Second and Sixth of the Railway Labor Act and Section 3 First (i), and
for that reason also, the Board lacks jurisdiction and we must dismiss
the claim.





That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;

:.7



That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and








                        By Order of Third Division


ATTEST:
        Executive Secretary


Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 30th day of May 1975.