(Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen PARTIES TO DISPUTE:


STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the General Committee of the Brotherhood of
Company: Railroad Signalmen on the Norfolk and Western Railway

(a) The Carrier violated the current Signalmen's Agreement, particularly the Scope and Rule 8 (1 Signalmen's Agreement to perform signal work at Portsmouth, Ohio.

(b) The Carrier now pay Signal Maintainer Nelson Bellar eight and one-tenths (8.1) hours at his overtime rate of pay for the violations cited in part (a):







The foregoing, initiated under date of October 5, 1972, was supplemented by the following:



Under date of July 9, 1973, the foregoing was supplemented by the following:



I

















OPINION OF BOARD: Two previous awards, 20528 and 20690 involving the same par
ties and the same issue are clear in establishing that
the organization has the burden of proof in disputes such as this involving
exclusivity. The record in the instant dispute contains no new material
evidence which would persuade us to change the view expressed in these
earlier awards. We find Awards 20528 and 20690 to be controlling and must
deny the Claims herein.





That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;



That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and








                        By Order of Third Division


ATTEST:
        Executive Secretary


Dated at Chicago, Illinois this 24th day of October 1975.

I

I