NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMEBT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number CL-20782
Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and Steamship
Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express and
( Station Employee
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Western Maryland warehouse company
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood
(GL-7555) that:
1. Carrier violated the provisions of the Clerks' Agreement
when it improperly held R. M. Mortimer out of service and would not permit
him to work after he had submitted a certificate from his personal
physician indicating he was physically able to resume duty, and that,
2. R. M. Mortimer shall nor be allowed one day of pay for the
dates of February 17, 18, 22, 23, 24 and 25, 1973.
OPINION CF' HOARD: At the time this claim arose, Claimant was employed
as a freight handler by Western Maryland Warehouse
Cue,
a wholly owned subsidiary of Carrier. On February 5, 1973
Claimant was granted at his request two days of personal leave, On the
evening of February
6,
1973 Claimant telephoned his supervisor that he
was ill, he was under a physician's care and he would advise later when
he was able to return to work. On February 7, 1973 Carrier's Chief Medical
Officer mailed to Claimant a certificate of disablement to be completed
before return to work. The record shows Claimant had a history of prior
illnesses and sick leave during his three year tenure with Carrier and,
in late 1972 was absent on sick leave for three months with infectious
mononucleosis.
Claimant alleges he never received the certificate of disablement and, on February 15, 1973 he telep
appointment with the Chief Medical Officer to approve his return to service.
An appointment was arranged for Claimant on Friday, February 16, 1973 and
he shored up without the completed certificate of disablement but rather
with a note from his physician stating that Claimant was under care from
February 5 - 16, 1973,inclusive,and was "advised to have complete bed rest
because of medical complications," The Chief Medical Officer refused to
accept this as sufficient to return Claimant to work and gave Claimant
another Physician's Report for completion by Claimant's doctor prior to a
Carrier physical. Claimant protested and said he was ready to go to work
that day. The Chief Medical Officer declined to discuss the matter further
or to telephone Claimant's physician for a report.
Award Number 20911 page 2
Docket Number CL-207$2
On Tuesday, February 20, 1973 Claimant telephoned his supervisor
who vas out of the office on that date. The call was returned on Wednesday, February 21, 1973 and Cl
Pbysician's Report from his doctor. An appointment was arranged for
Claimant with the Chief Medical Officer on Monday, February 26, 1973
at which he presented the completed Physician's Report, underwent an examination and was approved fo
resumed his duties as freight handler on February 27, 1973. Claimant
The instant claim alleges that the Chief Medical Officer violated Claimant's contractual rights
February 16, 1973. In essence, the claim asserts that the Carrier acted
arbitrarily, unreasonably and capriciously in not putting an employee
who had recently recovered from infectious mononucleosis back to work without any evidence whatsoeve
find in this record no basis in the Agreement or in reason for sustaining such
a claim. Nor can we say that the Chief Medical Officer arbitrarily or unreaso
ably delayed his approval of Claimant. Claimant indicated his readiness to
present legitimate evidence of fitness on Wednesday, February 21, 1973 and
he was given an appointment and returned to service two business days later
on Howiay, February 26, 1973. The claim is without merit and must be denied.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Hoard, upon the whole record
and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are
respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor
Act, as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Hoard has jurisdiction over
the dispute involved herein; and
That the Agreement was not violated.
A W A R D
Claim denied.
s
RATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT HOARD
By Order of Third Division
01
ATTEST:
Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 16th day of January 1976.