NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number CL-21043
Irwin M. Lieberman, Referee
(Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and Steamship
( Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express and Station
( Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Company
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood
(CL-7829) that:
(a) The Carrier violated the Rules Agreement, effective
December 1, 1949, particularly Rule 36, when it assessed discipline
of dismissal on J. A. Natalie, Yard Clerk at Blue Island, Illinois. '
(b) Claimant J. A. Natalie's record be cleared of the
charges brought against him on November 5, 1973.
(c) Claimant J. A. Natalie be restored to service with
seniority and all other rights unimpaired, and be compensated for
wage loss sustained during the period out of service, plus interest
at 6% per annum compounded daily.
OPINION OF BOARD: Claimant, in this dispute, was discharged after an
investigation, having been found guilty of failing
to report to work or advise of inability to do so on November 3, 1973.
Petitioner appealed the decision emanating from the investigation to the next higher official an
official designated by Carrier in timely fashion, as provided by Rule
36. It is noted that at each step the Organization appealed the decision and discipline and requeste
Division Chairman stated:
"Claims will be filed to make whole any loss suffered by
Mr. Natalie in connection with salary and all other benefits ....for this alleged unsubstantiated in
The record indicates that no such claims were filed. Rule 13 of the
applicable Agreement provides for the procedure in handling claims and
grievances on this property; and examination of that Rule verifies
the fact (specifically in Sections 3 and 6) that it is applicable to
claims arising out of disciplinary actions.
Award Number 20974 Page 2
Docket Number CL-21043
It is quite evident that the Claim presented herein is
quite different than the appeal of the discipline handled on the property and further that the proce
prefer to dispose of disputes such as that herein on their merits
rather than on procedural grounds, we are precluded from such action
in this matter. Based on the fact that the Claim herein was not
handled in accordance with Rule 13 or with carrier's highest designated Officer, we are barred from
Claim was not,handled in the usual manner as prescribed in the Railway Labor Act as amended (See Awa
others).
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the
whole record and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes wit
the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and
That the Claim is barred.
A W A R D
Claim dismissed.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
,~ By Order of Third Division
ATTEST:`IV-i
&&Z4A=e~
Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 27th day of February 1976.