NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT HOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number CL-20884
Irwin M. Lieberman, Referee
(Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and
( Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers
( Express and Station Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Norfolk and Western Railway Company
STATEMENT OF CLAIM:Claim of System Board of Adjustment No. 218 (GL-7608)
on the Lake Region, Norfolk and Western Railway Company,
that:
1. Carrier violated and continues to violate the Agreement between the parties when on May 3, 1973,
the Car Department Clerk positions were abolished, and one job established
combining those positions, and the Roundhouse Foremen were ordered to
perform clerical duties formerly assigned to the Engine House Clerk position.
2. Carrier shall pay Clerk E. C. Roffman three (3) hours punitive
rate for Second Trick, plus three
(3)
hours punitive rate for Third Trick,
commencing May 4, 1973, and for each day thereafter that this violation
continues.,
OPINION OF BOARD: The issue in this case is whether a Roundhouse Fore
man improperly performed certain clerical duties
formerly assigned to a clerical position covered by the applicable Agreement.
This dispute involves the Scope Rule of the Agreement. The Rule
in the Agreement before us is general in nature and does not specify any
work. In order to prevail, Petitioner has the burden of proving, by a preponderence of evidence, exc
position. The only work identified by the Organization in this dispute was
the filing of Form MP-60 by the Roundhouse Foreman; Carrier contends that
this work, which took no more than five minutes per shift, was not the exclusive work of clerks. Pet
the work in question was performed system-wide, exclusively, historically
and customarily by employee covered by the Agreement (see Awards 16787 and
14327 among a host of others). In view of Petitioner's failure to meet its
burden of proof, the Claim must be denied.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record
and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
Award Number 20994 page 2
Docket Number CL-20884
That the Carrier and the Employee involved in this dispute are
respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor
Act, as approved June
u, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Hoard has jurisdiction over
the dispute involved herein; and
That the Agreement was not violated.
A W A R D
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT HOARD
By Order of Third Division
ATTEST:/
Executive edretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 12th day of March 1976.