NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number SO-20890
(Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Chicago and North Western Transportation Company
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood of
Railroad Signalmen on the Chicago and North Western
Transportation Company:
(a) The Carrier is in violation of the current Signalmen's
Agreement in effect on the Missouri Division of the Chicago North Western
Transportation Company (formerly Chicago Great Western) particular rule 62
when on Feb. 21, 1973 it disciplined Mr. T. H. Duffy, forty-five
(45)
days
suspension from service effective February 26, 1973 and continuing through
April 9, 1973, account of the allegation that the territory he was assigned
to was improperly maintained.
(b) The carrier now be required to compensate Mr. T. H. Duffy,
the actual time lost because of this alleged violation and also clear his
record of this discipline.
fCarrier file: D-9-30-37
OPINION OF BOARD: The fact that an investigation was held prior to the
assessment of discipline, and without claimant having
requested an investigation, was not prejudicial to him and was not otherwise
barred by the Agreement. Moreover, claimant made no effort to waive the
investigation when it was, scheduled. Instead, in the presence of two Organization representatives h
he was ready to proceed. No other procedural violations prejudicial to
claimant are shown to have occurred.
Evidence adduced at the investigation revealed a variety of
deficiencies which indicated improper maintenance on the territory assigned
to claimant as a signal maintainer. Claimant's defense was insufficient to
exonerate him from responsibility for improper maintenance. The
45
day
suspension from service did not constitute an abuse of Carrier's discretion.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record
and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
Award Number 21081 page 2
Docket Number SG-20890
That the Carrier and the Employee involved in this dispute are
respectively Carrier and Employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor
Act, as approved June 21,
1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Hoard has jurisdiction over
the dispute involved herein; and
That the Agreement was not violated.
A W A R D
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT HOARD
By Order of Third Division
ATTEST:
42 Alt
&&/41~gmw
Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 28th day of May 1976.