(Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen
PARTIES TO DISPUTE: (
(Chicago and North Western Transportation Company

STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claims of the System Committee of the Brotherhood of Rail
road Signalmen on the Chicago and North Western Transpor
tation Company:



S-85 (a) The Carrier violated and continues to violate the current Signalmen's Agreement bearing two (2) and three (3) working an Asst. Signal Maintainer under the direct supervision of a Leading Signal Maintainer.

(b) Carrier now be required to pay the signal maintainer rate of pay to the Asst. Signal Maintainer who was used to work directly with and under the supervision of the Leading prior to the date of this claim and until this violation is corrected.

Claim No. 2:

S-86 (a) The Carrier violated and continues to violate the current Signalmen's Agreement bearing (2) and three (3) by working an Asst. Signal Maintainer under the direct supervision of a Leading Signal Maintainer.

(b) Carrier now be required to pay the signal maintainer rate of pay to the Asst. Signal Maintainer who was used to work directly with and under the supervision of the Leading Signal Maintainer at St. Francis, Wis. starting 60 days prior to the date of this claim and until this violation is corrected.

Claim No. 3:

S-87 (a) The carrier violated and continues to violate the current Signalmen's Agreement bearing (2) and three (3) by working an Aset. Signal Maintainer under the direct supervision of a Leading Si
(b) Carrier now be required to pay the signal maintainer rate of pay to the Asst. Signal Maintainer who was used to work directly with and under the supervision of the Leading prior to the date of this claim and until this violation is corrected.


Award Number 21098
Docket Number SG-21152

This dispute presents claims to the Board which are the same, in concept, as the one presented in Award

OPINION OF BOARD:

21097.

Page 2

We have considered the factual circumstances and assertions and defenses in both disputes, and we feel that our disposition in Award 21097 is equally applicable here.





That the Carrier and the Employee involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;

That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and





Claim dismissed.

ATTEST:

xaeutive Secretary

Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 14th

NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT HOARD

By Order of Third Division

day of June 1976.