(Brotherhood of Railroad Signalman PARTIES TO DISP(M:


STATEN= OF CLAIM: Claim of the General Committee of the Brotherhood


Appeal from the discipline of a reprimand imposed on Mr. A. Shoemaker on the charge:



OPINION OT HOARD: Clainanti" accident report established that he violated
the safety rule. That salts evidence vas presented at
the hean-~ and it does support the charge.

A review of the record indicates that the hearing was fair and inpartial. Therefore we most deny the 20993, 20663 and 20651.





That the Carrier and the Employee involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employee within the manias of the Railway labor Act, as approved June 21, 193*;

That this Division of the Adjustment Hoard has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and







. 11ATIQAI. RAILaOAD ADJUSTIM BOARD
' 1;2'e Ali Br Order of Third Division
ATTEST: f f~
Executive Secretary

Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 30th day of July 1996.