(Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen
PARTIES TO DISPITMs
Ttis Long Island Rail Road Company



Appeal on behalf of a reprimand assessed Joseph A. Pasdl7.a on the charge:

Violation of Safety Rule 3126 paragraphs y&e,qe and wGs while working on 118 switch at Jay Interlocking an May 5, 1973.

OPIMIOR O! HOARD: In order to justify discipline for an alleged riaa-
ticn of a safety role, there should be some evidence that the employe violated that rule, er otherwise performed his work in a careless manner. Our review of the record finds such evidence wasting. Therefore, we will smstain the clsis-





That the Carrier and the Uployes inwlred in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;

That this Division of the Adjustment Hoard has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and










Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 30th day of July 1976.