PARTIES TO DISPOTEs

NATIONAL RAnAQAD ADJUSTMENT BQkRD

THIRD DIVISION

Francis X. Qaian, Referee

(Brotherhood of Railroad sigoslmea

Chicago and North Western Transportation caepany

Award Number 21191
Docket Number SG-20945

STATE' CF CLAIM: Claims of the System General Committee of the Brotherhood of Railroad Signal

Western Transportation Compaqy:

Claim No. 1

(s) Carrier violated the current Agreement between the Brotherhood of Railroad Sigoalmon and the Chicago North Western Transportation Co. particularly rules 76 and the vacation agreement whoa it required Sig. Mtar. Lloyd Pautzke to coyer the rack of Oxford territory while regular assigned maintainer vas as vacation Mey 14 thra 25th. (80 hours)

(b) Carrier should now be required to compensate Dr. Pautzke for the time spent performing cork on the Oxford territory at his punitive rate of pay as signal maintainer in addition to whatever else he has received. Thin time to include the following:

May 14, 1973 3 hours . brokea rail M.P. 111.1

May 15, 1973 6 hours . rorking with Ldr. Madison on Oxford territory.

Nay 16, 1973 4 hours . vorking with Ldr. Madison an Oxford territory,

and an crossing protection.

May 17, 1973 2 hours replacing beads oft due to dragging equipment.

May 20, 1973 5 hours . darailaeat at Glen Oak, Win.

May 21, 1973 1 1/2 hoursrall ~ ~, Wis. rails.

Nay 24, 19'/3 5 hours...

Carrier's file: 79-8-1.34

Claim No. 2

(a) Carrier violated the current 3lgnalmsns Agreement especially rule 76 and Articles 6 and 10 of the vacation Agreement, rhea it failed to furnish vacation relief rocker an the Reedsburg, Win. signal maintenance territory while the regular assigned Reedsburg maintainer, W. Bay Deakin, was on vacation five days, Nay 21, thrn Nay 25, 1973.

(b) Carrier should now be required to compensate Mr. Krueger at the punitive rate of pay, in addition to what he has already received, for the tile he spent an the Reedsburg territory daring thin rind. ~Carrier'a file: 79-8-142

Award Mmnber 21191 Page 2

Docket NUmber 8G-20945

OPa1I01 OF HOARD: Thane claim are sial7,ar to many other claim presented
by this Organisation in opposition to the carrier'$
consolidation of Siga·Imm's territories. Since the issues herein have
previously been considered by this Hoard and the contentions of Petitioner
haw been rejected consistently, we nut follow the doctrine of ran adjnd
icata. The claim will be denied. Sea Avasds 20611, 20812, 20893, 20897,
207229 20796 and 20798.

FMIIf08: The Third Division of the Adjustment Hoard, upon the whole record and a71 the evidence, finds and holds:

That the parties waived oral hearing;

That the Carrier and the Eeiployes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved JSme 21, 1934;

That this Division of the Adjustmat Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and

That the Agreement was not violated.

A W A R D

Claims denied.

NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTIW Sam

a J(

Z/ 0 By Order of Third Division

ATTEST:

Executive Secretary

Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 13th day of August 1976.