NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number CL-21131
James C. McBrearty, Referee
(Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and Steamship
( Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express and Station
( Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul and Pacific
( Railroad Company
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood
(GL-7838) that:
1. Carrier violated and continues to violate the Clerks'
Rules Agreement in Seniority District No. 55 when it unjustly treated
employe Karen A. VOlkman by failing to award her Secretary Position
23630 and in lieu thereof awarded the position to a junior. employe:
2. Carrier shall now be required to assign employe K. A..
Volkman to Secretary Position No. 23630 and give her a seniority'
date in District No. 55 as of April 8, 1974.
3. Carrier shall now be required to compensate employe K. A.
Voliman the difference in rate of pay of Position 23630 and that of
the position assigned to for each workday retroactive to April 8, 1974,
and for all subsequent days until the violation is corrected, including
continuing payment if the position is assigned permanently to the
junior employe.
4. Carrier shall now be required to pay seven percent (7%)
interest compounded annually on such difference in rate until such
time as claimant is made whole.
OPINION OF BOARD: Claimant is regularly assigned to Stenographer _
Position No. 50240 in the Material Division,
Seniority District No. 118, where she holds a clerical seniority date
of March 16, 1970.
In its Bulletin No. 1, dated March 18, 1974, Carrier advertised
a vacancy on Secretary Position 23630 in District No. 55 due to a
maternity leave. Carrier determined that a shorthand speed of at least
80 WPM was required to perform the duties of this position. Claimant
and four others submitted applications. A11 were given a shorthand test,
Award Number 27.385 page 2
Docket Number CL-27131
and three of the five passed the test. The position was awarded to the
senior of the three who passed.
Although Claimant failed the test, she asserts that she should
have been assigned to this temporary vacancy, because she was senior
to the individual who was assigned.
Petitioner cites the following rules as being applicable to
the instant case:
"RULE 7 -- PROMOTION
Employes covered by these rules shall be in line for
promotion. Promotion shall be based on seniority, fitness
and ability; fitness and ability being sufficient, seniority
shall prevail.
NOTE: The word 'Sufficient' is intended to more
clearly establish the right of the senior
employe to the new position or vacancy
where two or more employes have adequate
fitness and ability.
RULE 8 -- TIME IN WHICH TO qUALIFY
(a) When an employe bids for and is assigned to
a permanent vacancy or new position he will be
allowed thirty (30) working days in which to qualify
and will be given full cooperation of department heads
and others in his efforts to do so. However, this
will not prohibit an employe being removed prior
to thirty (30) working days when manifestly incompetent.
If an employe fails to qualify he shall retain all
seniority rights but cannot displace a regularly assigned
employe. He will be considered furloughed as of date of
disqualification and. if he desires to protect his
seniority rights he must comply with the provisions of
Rule 12(b).
(b) An employe voluntarily relinquishing his permanent
position cannot displace a regularly assigned employe but
will be considered furloughed as of date of relinquishment
and, if he desires to protect his seniority rights, must
comply with the provisions of Rule 12(b).
Award Number 21385 Page 3
Docket Number CL-27131
"The provisions of this Rule 8(b) apply only during
the thirty (30) working day qualification period
referred to in Rule 8(a) or in a case where the physical
condition of an employe so changes as to make him
physically unable to continue on the
assignment.
Exceptions may be made in meritorious cases.
at * ~r
t
RULE 11 -- FILING APPLICATIONS-
OTHER SENIORITY DISTRICTS
Employes filing applications for positions bulletined
on other seniority districts will, if they possess
sufficient fitness and ability, be given preference on
a seniority basis over non employes and/or employes not
covered by these rules."
The Board finds that under Rule 7, an employe is not entitled
to a position unless such employe has sufficient fitness and ability to
fill the position. In this regard, the Hoard has consistently held
that Carrier may use tests or examinations as being determinative of
fitness and ability (Awards 18875, 18774, 18462, 17192, 15626, 14040,
7037, 5025, 5006, 4918 and 3273).
Furthermore, under the consistent decisions of this Hoard, - _
Carrier's decision as to fitness and ability cannot be disturbed
unless proved to have been made arbitrarily or capriciously. Such
burden of proof rests squarely on the Claimant. (Awards .21246,
21243, 21119, 21009,.20964, 20569, 20361 19404 and 19129).
Claimant has not-met this burden. A thorough and extensive
review of the complete record developed on the property, as well as
the arguments of the parties, reveals that Carrier's decision not to
accept Claimant's application for the position was based on the fact
that Claimant could not pass a speed test of 80 WPM. Consequently,
Carrier's decision was neither arbitrary nor capricious, and the
claim must be denied.
Award Number 21385 Page 4
Docket Number CL-21131
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Hoard, upon the whole
record and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute
are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway
Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction
over the dispute involved herein; and
That the Agreement was not violated.
A W A R D
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
ATTEST: ~'
Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 28th day of January 1977.
v
FEB 23 977
`! J BERG P