(Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen PARTIES TO DISPUTE:



STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the General Committee of the Brotherhood of
Railroad Signalmen on the Southern Pacific Transportation Company that:

(a) the Southern Pacific Transportation Company violated the Agreement between the Company and its employes in the Signal Department represented by the Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen, particularly the Scope rule, effective October 1, 1973.

(b) Mr. A. C. Chan and Mr. C. K. Magnes be allowed compensation for two (2) hours and forty (40) minutes each at their overtime rate for September 30, 1974. _/Carrier file: SIG 152-341/

OPINION OF BOARD: The sole issue before the Board in this case concerns
the damages properly allowable for the incident involved. Rule 72 of the parties' Agreement lays down a rule of damages that is binding upon all concerned, and Claimants have failed to prove that they are entitled to any additional compensation under that rule; therefore, the claim must be denied.





That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;

That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and





        Claim denied.


                          NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD

                          By Order of Third Division


ATTEST:
executive -Secretary

        Flated at Chicago, Illinois, this 18th day of February 1977.