(Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(The Western Pacific Railroad Company

STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the General Committee of the Brotherhood of
Railroad Signalmen on the Western Pacific Railroad
Company:

(a) The Western Pacific Railroad Company violated the Agreement between the Company and its Employes, represented by the Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen, effective September 1, 1949 (Reprinted July 1, 1961) and including revisions, particularly Rule 26 and all rules dealing with Seniority and Seniority Rights.


overtime rate for April 30, 1974, account Junior Employe called to perform.
overtime work. /Carrier's file: D - Case No. 9817-1974-BRS/

OPINION OF BOARD: The Organization's reliance on Rule 26, in this instance,
is misplaced. The rule is limited to, and only pertains
to, members of a "gang." Claimant herein was an assigned TCS Maintainer
with maintenance responsibilities over a designated district. Neither he nor
the other employes involved were members of a "gang" to whom Bile 26 applies.
Accordingly, Rule 26 has no application to the facts of the instant claim.
See Third Division Awards No: 18367 and 19920.





That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor
Act, as approved June 21, 1934; i

That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and








                        By Order of Third Division


ATTEST:
        xecutive secretary


Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 18th day of February 1977.