NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number CL-20738
William M. Edgett, Referee
(Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and Steamship Clerks,
( Freight Handlers, Express and Station Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Burlington Northern Inc.
STATEMENT OF CL.qIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood (GL-
7554) that:
(1) Carrier violated the Agreement between the parties when it
assigned the five-day position of Rate and Transit Clerk No. 9, awarded to
Mr. D. R. Larson, Jr., at Vancouver, Washington Freight Office, a work week
of Tuesday through Saturday instead of Monday through Friday as required by
the Agreement.
(2) The Carrier shall now be required to compensate Mr. D. R.
Larson, Jr., and/or his successors, eight (8) hours at the time and one-half
rate commencing Saturday, April 14, 1973 and each Saturday thereafter, and
eight (8) hours at the straight time rate for Monday, April 16, 1973 and
each Monday thereafter until the violation is corrected.
OPINION OF BOARD: Claimant is assigned to the position of Rate and Transit
Clerk at Vancouver, Washington. The Employees assert
that Carries has violated rules by assigning the position a work week of
Tuesday through Saturday instead of Monday through Friday. Rule 29 is the
principal Rule with which we are concerned and it reads:
"RULE 29. WORK WEEK
NOTE: The expressions 'positions' and 'work' used in this rule
refer to service duties or operations necessary to be performed
. the specified number of days per week, and not to the work week
of individual employes.
A. GENERAL. The Carrier will establish, effective September 1,
1949, for all employes subject to this Agreement, a work week of
forty (40) hours, consisting of five days of eight (8) hours each,
with two consecutive days off in each seven; the work week may be
staggered in accordance with the Carrier's operational requirements;
so far as practicable the days off shall be Saturday and Sunday.
This rule is subject to the following provisions.
Award Number 21428 Page 2
Docket Number CL-20738
&. FIVE-DAY POSITIONS. On positions the duties of which can
reasonably be met in five days, the days off will be Saturday
and Sunday.
C. SIX-DAY POSITIONS. Where the nature of the work is such
that employes will be needed six days each week, the rest days
will be either Saturday and Sunday or Sunday and Monday. It
is understood that six-day positions will be filled six days
per week except as provided in Rule 33.
D. SEVEN-DAY POSITIONS. On positions which have been filled
seven days per week any two consecutive days may be the rest
days with the presumption in favor of Saturday and Sunday.
It is understood that seven-day positions will be filled seven
days per week.
E. (1) REGULAR RELIEF ASSIGNMENTS. All possible regular relief
assignments with five days of work and two consecutive rest days
will be established to do the work necessary on rest days of assign-
ment in six or seven-day service or combinations thereof, or to
perform relief work on certain days and such types of other work on
other days as may be assigned under individual agreements. Where
no guarantee rule now exists such relief assignments will not be
required to have five days of work per week.
(2) Assignments for regular relief positions may on different
days include different starting times, duties and work locations
for employes of the same class in the same seniority district, provided they take the starting time,
employe or employes whom they are relieving.
F. DEVIATION FROM MONDAY-FRIDAY WEEK. If in positions or work
extending over a period of five days per week, an operational
problem arises which the carrier contends cannot be met under
the provisions of Rule 29, paragraph B. above, and requires that
some of such employes work Tuesday to Saturday instead of Monday
to Friday, and the employes contend the contrary, and if the parties fail to agree thereon, then
such assignments into effect, the dispute may be processed as a
grievance or claim under the rules agreements."
The key to this matter is whether the position of Rate and Transit
Clerk No. 9 is a five-day or a six-day position. Unless it meets the exception stated in Rule 29(b)
Saturday and Sunday or Sunday and Monday as its days off. The position was
Award Number 21428 Page 3
Docket Number CL-20738
bulletined as a five-day position but Carrier later recognized that it had
been so designated in error. Carrier's position is that there is work to
be performed six days per week and that the need for service is controlling
on the question of the character of the position. Carrier points to the
Note under Rule 29 which is repeated here because of its importance to the
resolution of this case:
"NOTE: The expressions 'positions' and 'work' used in
this rule refer to service, duties, or operations necessary
to be performed the specified number of days per week, and
not to the work week of the individual employes."
The Note shows that the parties did not intend to determine the
question of the length of the workweek by the workweek of individuals.
That determination can only be made by looking at the service which is necessary. If service is cons
position held by the employee is a six-day position. The cases have consistently held that the disti
in the Note to Rule 29 must be given effect. The workweek of an individual
employee has no bearing on whether the position the employee occupies is a
five, six, or seven day position.
Rule 29(c) defines a six day position as follows:
"Where the nature of the work is such that employees will
be needed six days each week."
The record before the Board shows that employees are needed six
days each week to perform the work of the Rate and Transit Clerk. It is
clearly a six day position. The rest days of a six-day position, as provided
by Rule 29(c), are either Saturday and Sunday or Sunday and Monday. Claimant
is on a Tuesday through Saturday schedule with rest days of Sunday and Monday.
His position is a six day position and he is assigned rest days within the
requirements of the Rule.
There are two Rate and Transit Clerk positions and the six-day coverage is achieved by having
Award Number 21428
Docket Number CL-20738
Page 4
staggered workweek The Rules permit Carrier to establish a Tuesday
through Saturday workweek for a six=day position and to stagger work-
weeks. When the work of a six-day position can be accomplished six days
per week by doing so then Carrier does not have to fill the position by
using relief employees as it would otherwise have to do. Since what
Carrier has done here is authorized by the Rules the claim must be denied.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record
and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are
respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor
Act, as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over
the dispute involved herein; and
That the Carrier did not violate the Agreement.
A W A R D
Claim denied.
0002
ATTEST:
Executive Secretary
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 28th day of February
1977.