NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number
SG-20974
William M. Edgett, Referee
(Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(The Long Island Rail Road Company
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the General Committee of the Brotherhood
of Railroad Sig!almen on the Long Island Rail Road:
Carrier pay each employe named on the seniority roster (attached
to initial claim) eight
(8)
hours at the pro-rata rate, where applicable,
and any overtime, where applicable..(Carrier's records will reflect this)
between the hours of
12
midnight and
8:30
p.m., August
8, 1973.
rSeniority roster attached to the initial claim, revised January 1,
1973,
posted April
3, 1973,
contains
227
name)
OPINION OF BOARD: Claimants engaged in an unauthorized work stoppage.
Carrier obtained a temporary restraining order and
the Organization's General Chairman instructed the employer to return
to work. The unauthorized work stoppage had taken the form of a "sickout" and Carrier decided to req
to have a physical examination by Carrier's physician before returning
to work. The employes refused to ta'se the examination and remained
outside Carrier's Jamaica Station while the General Chairman and their
attorney consulted with the Federal Judge who had ordered the employes
to return to work. As a result of that meeting, Carrier rescinded its
order requiring a physical examination and the employes returned to
work.
The claim is for pay for the day lost by the employes who
refused to take the physical examination. The organization contends
that Carrier caused the employes to lose work on August
8, 1973,
and
that Carrier should be recuired to pay them for the time that they lost.
Essentiaaly the
Organization wishes
Carrier to examine tae
seniority roster, determine which employes were scheduled to work and
pay the employes so determined. No employe is identified as having
reported for the physical examination as directed by Carrier. Carrier
declines the claims, on among other grounds, the point that the claim is
vague and indefinite and does not identify the Claimants with the required
particularity. It is not necessary to reach precisely that point because
it is interwoven with a point which the Board finds is fatal to the claim.
Award Number 21429 Page
2
Docket Number
SG-20974
It is generally recognized that employes who are instructed by
Carrier to perform an act which is not detrimental to their health and
safety are required to "obey now and grieve later." That is. Carrier
instructions which are alleged to be in violation of the Agreement are to
be carried out, and any alleged infringement on employes' rights under
the Agreement is to be determined through the grievance procedure. The
employes take the position that Carrier was not authorized by the Agreement to require physical exam
physical examination and lost time from work thereby, or who was prevented
from working would be in a position to challenge Carrier's right to
require the examination and to seek reimbursement for his loss. An
employe who refused to comply with Carrier's request has forfeited his
right to grieve and has also made it impossible to determine whether or
not he stood ready to work on the date in question. It is ordinarily
understood that employes who are on a work stoppage are not considered
to have left that status until they make an unequivocable offer to return
to work. No such offer can be found in the record before the Board.
Even after the General Chairman and the attorney conferred with the
District Judge, the employes still refused to return to work until the
General Chairman personally appeared at Jamaica station. They were
unwilling to accept his word over the telephone. Given all of these
facts and circumstances, the Board believes that it must deny the claim.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole
record and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute
are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway
Labor Act, as approved June 21,
1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction
over the dispute involved herein; and
That the claim should be denied. '
f' i
A W A R D
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
ATTEST:
~i ,
Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 28th day of February 1977.