NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT HOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number CL-21629
David C. Randles, Referee
(Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and
( Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers,
( Express and Station Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Consolidated Rail Corporation
( (former Lehigh Valley Railroad Compamy)
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood
(GL-8093) that:
(a) Carrier's action in assessing Scrap Cutter George W. Johnson
with discipline to the extent of 45 demerits as a consequence of an alleged
"hearing and investigation" at 10:00 A.M. and an additional 15 demerits as
a consequence of a second alleged "hearing and investigation" at 1:00 P.M.,
both on the date of October 15, 1974, should be voided because Carrier
failed to prefer a "precise charge" in the Notices scheduling the aforesaid
proceedings.
(b) Carrier's action in dismissing former Scrap Cutter George W.
Johnson effective at the end of a tour of duty on October 22, 1974, because
the assessment of the aforesaid total of
60
demerits resulted in an accumulation of more than 90 demerits on his record, was arbitrary, capr
an abuse of authority.
(c) Carrier now be required to clear Mr. Johnson's record of the
here disputed 60 demerits, reinstate him to its service with seniority and
all other employment rights unimpaired, and compensate him at the pro rata
Scrap Cutter's rate of pay for each working day subsequent to October 22,
1974 and until the effective date of his reinstatement.
OPINION OF HOARD: The issue in this case is, for all intents and purposes,
the same as that considered in Award 21458 with
the additional factor-that the
60
demerits assessed herein when added to
the
60
demerits previously assessed, totaled more than 90 demerits, which
resulted in Claimant's discharge.
It is apparent from a thorough review of the record presented
herein, Claimant simply did not desire to work for this Carrier, except at
his own convenience. The totality of his conduct since his employment
unmistakably reflects this attitude.
Under these circumstances, we are satisfied that Carrier's action'
in assessing discipline of discharge was warranted and we will- not disturb
it
0
Award Number 21459 Page 2
Docket Number CL-21629
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole
record and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are
respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor
Act, as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over
the dispute involved herein; and
That the Agreement was not violated.
A W A R D
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
ATTEST:,(// i (9 ~ ~' ~
Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 18th day of March
1977.
17
f:;
e