NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number CL-21311+
William G. Caples, Referee
(Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and Steamship Clerks,
( Freight Handlers, Express and Station Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Southern Pacific Transportation Company (Pacific Lines)
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood (GL-79111+)
that:
(a) The Southern Pacific Transportation Company violated the current
Clerks' Agreement on October 16, 1974, when it assessed sixty demerits against
the personal record of Henry Howard, Jr. following investigation at which
he was tried for' allegedly failing to comply with Rule "M" of its General
Rules and Regulations; and
(b) The Southern Pacific Transportation Company shall now be
required to purge the personal record of Henry Howard, Jr. respecting the
sixty demerits assessed thereto as set forth in paragraph (a).
OPINION OF BOARD: Claimant entered Carrierb service on October 28, 1968,
and at the time this dispute arose was regularly assigned
to a position titled Lead File Clerk.
The instance out of which this claim arose was on August 16, 1974
when Claimant alleged he sustained a back injury when lifting boxes in the
file room. No notice of the alleged injury was given the Carrier until
September 19, 1974 at which time he went to the Station Clerk and advised
her he had sustained an injury "approximately one month ago." Thereafter
Claimant was referred to a Mr. Vallejo in the Maintenance of Way Department
who aided him in filling out an "Employe's Report of Accident." The report
was filed on September 19, 1974.
By letter dated September 23, 1974 Claimant was notified to be
present on October 2, 1974 for formal investigation in connection with
Claimant's "alleged failure to report without delay to your immediate
supervisor and make out written report to Superintendent relative to alleged
personal injury sustained" by Claimant on "August 16, 1974 while employed as
Lead File Clerk." The letter advised such failure may involve a violation of
the tenth paragraph of Rule "M" reading:
"Each personal injury suffered by an employe, and any injury to
another employe or person, of which an employe has personal
knowledge, must be reported without delay to his immediate
supervisor; and written report completely and correctly made
must thereafter be promptly mailed to Superintendent."
for which occurrence Claimant was charged with responsibility.
Award Number 21473 Page 2
Docket Number CL-21314
Subsequent to the investigation Carrier advised Claimant by letter
dated October 16, 1974:
"Evidence adduced at formal investigation
...
established
your responsibility for failure to report an alleged
personal injury without delay to your immediate supervisor
on August 16, 1974."_
and, further, that failure to discharge the responsibility was found to be a
violation of Rule "M" (which has been hereinbefore quoted) by reason of
which Claimant's discipline record was assessed sixty (60) demerits.
The position of the Claimant is that when he learned "that it was
necessary to file an accident report," he "did so at once and the penalty
assessed therefor, was not justified" and a reversal of the order of assessment of the demerits is a
It is well established by this Board that disobedience of Carrier's
Operating and Safety Rules is an offense which merits discipline. The
requirement of prompt filing of accident reports is a rule of such long
standing its necessity requires no citation. See Awards 16023, 17900, 19298
and 21441.
The record is clear that there is substantial evidence that the
rule was in existence; the Claimant had knowledge of it and failed to comply
with it. The Carrier's decision as to guilt is supported by the record.
The Carrier assessed a penalty which does not appear to be unreasonable,
arbitrary or capricious. Awards 9449, 10429, 12811 and 73168.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record
and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are
respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor
Act, as approved June 21, 1931+;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction
over the dispute involved herein; and
That the Agreement was not violated.
A W A R D
Claim denied.
Award Number 21473 Page 3
Docket Number CL-21314
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
ATTEST:
Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 31st day of March 1977.