NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number CL-21269
(Brotherhood~of Railway, Airline and Steamship Clerks,
( Freight Handlers, Express and Station Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Southern Railway Company
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood (GL-7864)
that:
Carrier violated the agreement on October 27, 1973 when it unjustly
disciplined Claimant R. E. Allred, suspended him from the service of the
company commencing Monday, October 29 to and including November 27, 1973, a
period of 30 calendar days.
For this violation, the Carrier shall now compensate Claimant R. E.
Allred, Agent-Telegrapher, Liberty, North Carolina by paying him for all time
lost as a result of this unjust discipline, $1,113.72.
OPINION OF BOARD: Agent-Telegrapher R. E. Allred was suspended for 30 days
for closing his station without authority.
The question is whether he had authority to close his station as
he did and, if he did not, whether there was sufficient doubt as to actual
instructions as to warrant reduction in suspension.
Saturday, October 27, 1973 was a regular workday for claimant at
Liberty, North Carolina, a small intermediate one-man station.
On that day the assistant superintendent and'Tiazamaster Swing _.
stopped in the depot at Liberty to use the telephone and found that Allred
was not on duty, that the train order signals were in the proceed position
and that agency records were not up to date.
Those two officers then contacted the train dispatcher at Ashville
and determined that Agent Allred had not reported to the chief dispatcher
before he left and closed the office.
On these facts, the company charged the agent with violation of
operating rules 802 and 1162 in that the claimant did not close his office
with proper authority.
It is uncontested that claimant previously was authorized and did
close the station each Saturday after all scheduled trains had run and all
work had, been completed but only after so advising the train dispatcher.
Award Number 21520 Page 2
Docket Number CL-21269
Claimant's defense is that he had recently been authorized by
Trainmaster Swing to close the office on Saturday when he, the claimant,
had finished his work, without having to report to the train dispatcher
that he-was closing his station. This "authorization" to close the office
as claimant did on October 27, 1973 was corroborated by Agent Frank Coble
who had heard the trainmaster give this permission to claimant.
The fact that Trainmaster Swing was one of the two officials who
decided that claimant had improperly closed his station on the day in question casts doubt on the au
station without checking in with the train dispatcher.
In view, however, of claimant's unblemished prior record and a reasonable basis for confusion as
Saturday after scheduled runs had been completed, the penalty imposed by the carrier of 30 days'susp
of
15 days-is more appropriate to the offense. Therefore, claimant's suspension shall be red
____in_.accordance_with a .-regular schedule for 15 of the 30_days_in which he was suspended.
The complaint that the investigation was unfair is not well taken.
The claimant was adequately represented at the hearing and he had the opportunity and did present a
part of his defense. Whatever fault can be found with the carrier having
lifted claimant's rulebook prior to the investigation which he felt was needed
to prepare his defense was only technical in nature because claimant clearly
knew the rules and had easy access to those rules from other employes.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, after giving the parties
to this dispute due notice of hearing thereon, and upon the whole
record and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are
respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor
Act, as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over
the dispute involved herein;-and
That the discipline was excessive
Award Number 21520 Page 3
Docket Number CL-21269
A W A R D
_Claim denied except that suspension of 30 days shall be
reduced to suspension of 15 days with back pay as though Claimant had
worked a regular schedule during 15 days in which he had,been suspended
by the carrier.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
094azle..O'
By Order of Third Division
ATTEST:
Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 19th day of May 1977.