( Express and Station Employes PARTIES TO DISPUTE:


STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood


1. Carrier violated the Agreement between the parties when they refused to allow punitive pay for work performed outside E. D. Kerns' regularly assigned hours on the following dates:















OPINION OF BOARD: On eleven of fourteen consecutive days in October
1973, Storekeeper E. D. Kerns, witnessed by other employes, performed overtime work outside his assigned hours, on his rest days, and on one holiday, for which he claimed no payment. On December 6, 1973, the Organization's local chairman filed a claim in his behalf for time and one-half payment for the additional time worked. Carrier defends against payment therefor on the basis that no claim was submitted by Claimant whose overtime, in any event, was a voluntary performance of service without authority which cannot be used as a basis of a claim.







Award 18012 (McGovern) denied an overtime claim when claimant performed work on his own volition, holding:



We basically affirm these holdings; however, here there appears to be more involved. In a brief two-week period the storekeeper performed 35 hours and 15 minutes of To stop this practice and to police the agreement, the Organization filed a claim. The comments in our Award 18012 suggesting that to allow an employe to work overtime whenever he himself deems it necessary can only lead to chaos must be applied with equal force both ways. While we do not intend to inhibit extra or superior completion of assigned tasks, if these duties cannot be. completed within regular hours, they should be paid for at overtime rates. While management has the right to authorize overtime, it also has the right to prohibit overtime unless it is authorized. We will deny the claim with the recommendation that the practice complained of, now known to Carrier, be discontinued.





                    Docket Number CL-21412


That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;

That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and

        The agreement was not violated.


                    A W A R D


        Claim denied.


                          NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD

                          By Order of Third Division

ATTEST; !Ii A/ 6.1.,
        Executive Secretary


Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 17th day of June 1977.