NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number CL-21067
(Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and Steamship
( Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express and Station
( Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(The Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the Systems Committee of the Brotherhood,
GL-7742, that:
(1) Carrier violated the Agreement between the parties when
it failed to pay Mr. S. M. Ford
8
hours' pay at the rate of position
of Steno-Clerk for September
8, 1971
and each subsequent work-day,
Monday thru Friday, to and including October 20,
1971,
and
(2) Carrier shall pay Claimant Ford amount shown in (1)
above.
OPINION OF BOARD: Having been displaced from his Yard Clerk position
at Indianapolis, Indiana, Claimant Ford exercised
his seniority on a Steno-Clerk position, which he occupied effective
September 3,
1971.
On September
7, 1971,
Trainmaster B. M. Thomas
notified claimant by letter that he was being disqualified from this
position, effective at the end of his tour of duty on that date. On
September
8, 1971
a letter from Local Chairman L. H. Tackett requested
"a hearing to show reason for disqualification" of claimant.
Rule 32 (c) provides in pertinent part that removal from a
position due to disqualification "shall be accomplished by written
notice to the employe and hearing and investigation shall be held,
if requested, within
5
days from date of notice and written decision
shall be rendered within 10 days." It will be observed that the Rule
specifies written notice of disqualification and written decision
following a hearing and investigation if the latter are requested,
but the Rule does not require that such request be reduced to writing,
nor does it mandate that the hearing and investigation be scheduled
in writing. The Local Chairmen filed written request for a hearing
although the Rule did not require him to do so. Had the local
Carrier officials followed a similar course in scheduling a hearing,
this dispute may not have arisen.
Award Number 21610 Page 2
Docket Number CL-21067
The difference between the parties is confined to the Rule
32 (c) procedure. The Organization contends no hearing was held,
claimant's procedural rights were therefore violated, and the claim
should be sustained for the period of September
8,
1971 through
October 20, 1971. On October 21, 1971 an employe senior to claimant
displaced onto the involved Steno-Clerk position.
There is a conflict in the facts following the Local
Chairman's hand delivery of the request for hearing. The Local
Chairman says the Trainmaster stated his schedule for Thursday,
September 9, 1971, did not permit a hearing that day, and at the
Trainmaster's request "it was agreed that the hearing would be held
at a time and date mutually acceptable to both of us." (Record p. 3)
The Trainmaster says a hearing was scheduled for 3:15 P.M. September
9, but was postponed to 10:00 A.M. September 10 at the Local Chairman's
request.
In any event, the Local Chair acknowledges being advised
that Friday morning that a hearing was scheduled. Carrier states
its Trainmaster's Chief Clerk informed Claimant Ford by telephone
Thursday afternoon that a hearing concerning his disqualification was
scheduled for 10:00 A.M., Friday, September 10.
It is established that neither claimant nor any of his
representatives appeared at the hearing. The Clerks contend that
if a hearing was held, the absence of claimant and his representative
was not a bar, and in fact the Rule requires that a hearing be held
if requested. We agree with Carrier's stated view that since neither
claimant nor his representative appeared at the hearing, there was
no reason to hold it.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole
record and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute
are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway
Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction
over the dispute involved herein; and
That the Agreement was not violated.
Award Number 21610 page
3
Docket Number CL-21067
A W A R
D
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT
BOARD
By Order of Third Division
ATTEST:
Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 29th day of July 1977.