(Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and ( Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, ( Express and Station Employes PARTIES TO DISPUTE: (R. C. Haldeman, Trustee of the Property of ( Lehigh Valley Railroad Company, Debtor



Claim in behalf of Robert Cunfer, Storekeeper, Allentown Car Yard, during the period commencing July 15, 1974, and continuing until such date as violation is corrected, claiming an additional day's pay at the rate of that position. Carrier violated Rules 7, 9, 23 (b) and 56 of our Agreement by arbitrarily assigning all the duties of the improperly abolished position to Mr. Cunfer. The abolished position was that of Storekeeper at Allentown Yard Engine-house, with remaining duties assigned to Car Shop Storekeeper. This is in violation of Rule 19 (a) of the revised May 1, 1955 Agreement.

OPINION OF BOARD: Petitioner argues that Carrier violated five rules
of the Agreement when, on July 15, 1974, certain
changes were made in work assignments among storekeepers in the
Bethlehem-Allentown Terminal. The thrust of the complaint seems to be
that Carrier failed to fully comply with the last sentence of Rule 19
(a) reading:



The Organization admits that the abolishment notice containing the required information on force reductions and reassignment of work was posted to all points on the seniority district but alleges the rule was only partly complied with because a more specific notice was not furnished organization representatives. The Carrier argues that a copy of the notice was furnished Organization representatives and, inasmuch as the position abolished was vacant at the time, this general notice met the requirements of the last sentence of Rule 19(a).
Award Number 21622
Docket Number CL-21579

Page 2

The record reveals that Carrier issued three notices on July 3, 1974, which (1) cancelled Bulletin No. 2078 advertising the vacant Storekeeper position on the Allentown Enginehouse, (2) abolished, effective twelve days later, the position and assigned the remaining duties to an equally-rated position of Car Shop Storekeeper, and (3) notified the Car Shop Storekeeper of the added duties of his assignment.

It seems to this Board that the three notices, considered collectively, met the requirements of the rule. The claim will be denied.



That the parties waived oral hearing;

That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaiing of the. Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;

That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and

The Agreement was not violated.

A W A R D

Claim denied.

ATTEST: 4vgml d?a~_

Executive Secretary

NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division

Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 29th day of July 1977.

AU u 2 4 177