NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number .'fW-21658
David C. Randles, Referee
(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Norfolk and Western Railway Company (Lake Region)
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood
that:
(1) The suspension of fifteen
(15)
days imposed upon Assistant
Section Foreman Rex Trizzle, Jr. for allegedly "engaging in activities
which would interfere with or distract your attention from your work"
was capricious, arbitrary, without just and sufficient cause and on the
basis of unproven charges (System File MW-FKT-74-1).
(2) Assistant Section Foreman Rex Trizzle, Jr. shall now be allowed
the benefits prescribed in Agreement Rule 22(e).
OPINION OF BOARD: This is a discipline case involving fifteen
(15)
days
actual suspension assessed against Assistant Section
Foreman Rex Trizzle, Jr.. On August
15,
1974, claimant was assigned work
from
7:00
A.M. to 4:00 P. M. with an 11:00 A.M. to 12 Noon lunch hour.
Claimant and two other employes traveled by claimant's personal car from
Brocton to Metcalf in order to move a brush cutter. On the way back to
Brocton, claimant's car had transmission trouble. Securing a ride into
town, claimant secured the use of a truck belonging to an accompanying
employe and returning to his vehicle they towed it to claimant's home
during lunch hour. Upon arriving at claimant's home, two individuals
accosted claimant and his fellow employe. When claimant "came to", he
learned that his fellow employe was in pain. Claimant then borrowed a
car and took said injured employe to the hospital.
Claimant was notified to report for a hearing scheduled originally
for September 11, 1974, and postponed until October 9, 1974, to determine
claimant's "responsibility while on duty in engaging in activities which
would interfere with or distract your attention from your work".
Following the investigation, Carrier assessed the discipline by
letter of October 22,
1974,
which reads in part: "For your responsibility
as developed in the hearing, you are assessed fifteen
(15)
days actual
suspension and Roadmaster Smith will advise you when to serve this
discipline." An amended letter of October 23,
1974
reads in part: "Please
disregard my letter of October 22, 1974, and the following is corrected
Award Number 21657 Page 2
Docket Number MW-21658
letter:- For your responsibility as developed in the hearing, you
are assessed fifteen (15) days actual suspension and Roadmaster Smith will
advise you when to serve this discipline." Both letters were signed by
G. W. Woods, Division Engineer-Maintenance.
Originally the Organization made part of its appeal based upon a
procedural flaw
which they
subsequently abandoned, and now present before
this Board the allegation that the discipline was without just and sufficient
cause and on the basis of unproven charges.
This Board has held on innumerable occasions that it is not the
function of said Board to substitute its judgment for that of the Carrier
in discipline cases. However, upon careful review of the record, we
do feel that the claimant was charged with the entire responsibility
for the events occurring on August 15, 1974, which the record does not
support.
A basic tenet of arbitral review is that the discipline must be
reasonable. There is no evidence to suggest that the Carrier considered
arty of the mitigating circumstances surrounding this case; and, therefore,
we must consider that the discipline is too severe and excessive. We
shall, therefore, reduce the discipline imposed to five (5) days without
pay. Accordingly, the claim is sustained to the extent that Carrier shall
amend claimant's record to show a five (5) day suspension and shall
compensate him for ten (10) days wage loss suffered less outside earnings,
if any.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole
record and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute
are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway
Labor Act, as approved June 21,
1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction
over the dispute involved herein; and
That the discipline be reduced.
Award Number 21657 Page
3
Docket Number MW-21658
A W A R D
The claim is sustained to the extent indicated in the opinion.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
ATTEST:
Executiv&2Z45;7m~ -
e Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 18th day of August 1977.