NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTDENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number
SG-21590
William G. Caples, Referee
(Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen
PARTIES TO
DISPUTE:
' (Southern Railway Company
STATEG1ENT OF CIAIhi:
Claim of the General Committee of the Brotherhood
of Railroad Signalmen on the Southern Railway
Company et a1.
On behalf of R. A. Stults, Assistant Signalman, account not
being awarded the Signal Maintainer position at Youndville, Alabama,
that he be awarded the position and be given seniority as a signalman
ahead of Mr. J. R. Boothe, and that he be compensated for the difference in pay between what he rece
what he would have received had he been awarded the position of signal
maintainer, Moundvillle, Alabama, claim to begin on the day of her.
Boothe's assignment in the signalman-signal maintainer class.
(Carrier file:
SG-o'9)
OPINION OF BOARD: Claimant, an Assistant Signalman, entered Carrier's
service in September
1973,
(seniority date September
10,
1973)
and as of October
1974
occupied a position of assistant signal
man in Signal Yard No.
5,
Lines West seniority district.
On July
22, 1974,
by Bulletin the C & S Department advertised
vacancy in positions of Signal Maintainer, headquarters Moundville,
Alabama.
On August
5, 1974,
by Bulletin the C & S Department announced
that no bids had been received during the bulletin period from qualified
employees above the assistant class. The Department then proceeded to j
consider applications of employes in the assistant class who were in
training for positions of Signalmen-Signal Maintainer but had not com
pleted the required eight periods of basic training as provided in Rule
2
(e) of the Signalmen's Agreement.
On October
14, 1974,
by Bulletin, an Assistant Signal
man
in
Signal Gang No.
2
whose seniority date was November
19, 1973
was awarded
the position of Signal Maintainer, Moundville, Alabama, by appointment.
Award Number 21676 Page 2
Docket Number SG-21590
The agreement Rule 2 (d) (2) states that basic training
shall consist of eight periods of 130 eight hour days of service each
but Rule 2(d)
(3)
states promotion to the position of signal maintainer may be made from the ranks of assistant si
signal maintainer prior to that period under certain conditions qualifications being sufficient. Qua
shall govern the selection.
The- record shows the Carrier believed the person awarded
the position was qualified and the Claimant at the time in question was
not qualified.
The question raised here under Rule 2(d) was considered under a similar agreement provision in T
18347
(Dorsey)
in which it is said:
"Under this provision it is the Carrier's
prerogative to first exercise'its judgment
as to whether an employee is qualified or
not for orcmotion before he has successfully completed his basic training. Should
Carrier's decision-whether it be 'qualified'
or 'not qualified~rbe challenged, the burden
of proof that it is contrary to the fact is
borne by the
challenger".
Petitioner in this appeal has not satisfied its burden of
proof that Claimant was qualified by substantial factual evidence of
probative value. The junior employee was properly promoted.
r'INDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole
record and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute
are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway
Labor Act, as approved June 21,
1934;
Award Number 21676 Page
3
Docket Number SG-21590
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction
over the dispute involved herein; and
The Carrier did not violate the Agreement.
A W A R D
I
Claim denied.
I
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUST= BOARD
By Order of Third Division
ATTEST: >
Mcecutive Secretary
i
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 31st day of August 1977.
i
I
II
i
i
i