NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number CL-21542
Robert W. Smedley, Referee
(Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and
Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers,
( Express and Station Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Missouri Pacific Railroad Company
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood,
GL-8130, that:
1. Carrier violated the Clerks' Rules Agreement when it failed
to give "five working days' advance notice in writing" to Clerk A. Stephens,
St. Louis, -Missouri, who was occupying the position of Route and Car
Assignment Clerk No. 072, when the position was abolished (Carrier's
File 205-4992).
2. Carrier shall now be required to compensate Clerk A. Stephens
for five (5) days, at eight (8) hours each day, at pro rata rate of
$41.49 per, day.
OPINION OF BOARD: The issues before the Board are (1) whether the
temporary occupant of a position is entitled to the
required five-day written notice of abolishment, and (2) damages.
The regular occupant of Route and Car Assignment Clerk No. 072
retired January 31, 1975. Claimant A. Stephens, a Messenger Clerk, opted
to fill the vacancy. This was done pursuant to Rule 9 - FILLING OF NEW
POSITIONS AND VACANCIES OF LESS THAN 30 DAYS, Section (b), concerning
"temporary positions and vacancies." Claimant worked one day on the
position, Saturday, February 1, 1975. He then took the position's two
rest days, Sunday and Monday, February 2 and 3, 1975, only to be called
on the phone February 3 to be told the position was abolished and he
was to return to his regular job on February 4.
"Rule 14
REDUCING FORCE, ABOLISHING
POSITIONS, DISPLACEMENTS
AND FURLOUGHS"
"(b) When regularly established positions are abolished,
the occupants thereof will be given a minimum of five
working days' advance notice in writing, copy to Division
and General Chairman, except as provided in Section (c)
hereof."
Award Number 21691 Page 2
Docket Number CL-21542
"NOTE: The word 'occupant', as used in this rule means
the employe working the position at the time the abolishment notice is issued."
The complaint is that Stephens should have been given the five-day
written notice. We hold that he should have. The above rule and note
are literal and specific on the subject.
Claimant did not lose work. Thus, the damages debate is
between $1.75 per day or $8.75 for the five days, being the difference
in rate between the tap jobs, or $41.49 per day, a total of $207.45,
representing five days pay on the abolished position. We are confronted
with the recurring issue whether this Board has the power to, and should,
add damages beyond compensation for loss.
Having examined all of the citations provided on both sides
of this issue, we are convinced that the prevailing rule in this Division
allows such damages. Awards 19899 .(Sickles) and 20311 (Lieberman).
We are also convinced that this is the correct rule where clear rights
are being enforced. The common law "make whole" theory often strips
a right of any remedy, inviting violation anew. This has a moral base,
the imperative being integrity of contract.
Having a moral base, the rule must be applied morally. It
cannot follow that every violation, technical or otherwise, automatically
elicits a penalty. We should not incite the "caught you" mentality
wanting to empty the exchequer on strength of miscrossed t's. That is
very close to what is being sought in this case. Here we have a technical
violation. The carrier mistakenly filled the vacancy and then decided
to abolish the position, omitting the required notice. It got caught
in a little web. But there is no invidious threat to contract integrity,
no demand of conscience that a wrong be conquered not to wrong again.
We will award the lost pay but not pay for the abolished position.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole
record and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute
are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway
Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;
Award Number 21691 Page 3
Docket Number CL-21542
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction
over the dispute involved herein; and
The contract was violated.
A W A R D
Part 1, of the claim is sustained.
Part 2. of the claim is sustained to the extent indicated in
the Opinion.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSMIENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
ATTEST:
A"0'44~
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 31st day of August 1977.