NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISICN Docket Number MW-21422
William G. Caples, Referee
(Brotherhood of
Maintenance of
Way Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Southern Pacific Transportation Company
( (Pacific Lines)
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood
that:
(1) The Carrier violated the Agreement when it assigned a
Mechanical Department employe instead of a Water Service Sub-Department
employe to unload diesel fuel at Dunsmuir, California on March 4, 11,
18, 25, April 1, 8, 15, 20, 26, 29, May 6, 13, 20, 28, June 3, 10, 17,
1974 and on subsequent dates (System Files MofW 152-793, MofW 152-796).
(2) Because of the aforesaid violation, Water Service Sub-department employe Virgil Sword be all
of pay at his straight-time rate for March 4, 11, 18, 25, April 1, 8, 15,
26, 29, May 6, 13, 20, 28, June 3, 10, 17, 1974; two hours and forty
minutes of pay at his time and one-half rate for April 20, 1974 and pay
at his appropriate rate for a number of hours equal to the total expended
by the Mechanical Department in performing such work on subsequent dates.
OPINION OF BOARD: On March 4, 1974, and each of the dates for which
claim is made herein Claimant was assigned to the
position of Water Service Mechanic, Class A, with headquarters in
Dunsmuir, California, in the Western Seniority District on the Oregon
Division of Carrier.
At Dunsmuir, California, diesel locomotives are fueled by
Mechanical Department employes directly from fuel tank cars that are
placed on a storage track in the yard. A snorkel with connecting fuel
line is inserted into the top of the tank car and the fuel is pumped
out when needed. Loaded fuel tank cars are spotted on the storage
track late one day of each week and empty tank cars are switched out
on another day. These switching movements require having an employe
available to connect the fuel lines onto the
incoming full
tank car
loads and disconnect and remove the fuel lines on empty tank cars
before they are removed from the storage track. This work, performed
twice a week, coincidental with the delivery and removal of tank cars, prior
to the date of claim had been performed at Dunsmuir by employes assigned
to a Water Service gang with headquarters at Dunsmuir. Prior to January
14,
1974,
Claimant has been assigned to connect and disconnect the fuel
lines from tank cars at Dunsmuir as above described. On January 14,
1974,
Carrier's Assistant Trainmaster assigned this work to the Roundhouse
Foreman at Dunsmuir.
Award Number 21701 Page 2
Docket Number bW-21422
It is the position of the Organization that under the
Agreement this work at Dunsmuir was its exclusive jurisdiction. They
assert:
"the scope rule explicitly includes pumpers of
fuel oil and water. The parties carefully spelled
out the extent and the limitations of the work
which is allocated to a scope-covered pumper.
Said pumpers thereby have the exclusive right to
perform the work of pumping fuel oil and the work
of pumping water -- no more and no less."
(Underlining the Organization's
The Carrier took three positions, two procedural and one to
the merits. Speaking to the first procedural question the Carrier
requested notice of this proceeding be given to American Railway
Supervisors Association and the International Brotherhood of Firemen
and Oilers. Such notices were given. The American Railway Supervisors
Association indicated they had no interest in the dispute before the
Board. The International Brotherhood of Firemen and Oilers made a
submission which is not pertinent to this dispute which involves specific
work at Dunsmuir, California, which the International Brotherhood of
Firemen and Oilers do not and have not handled at that place. The Claim
before us is quite specific involving specific work at a specific
location. It is the Board opinion this matter is properly before it.
The second procedural object is the claim here consists of two
separate claims with the same cause of complaint and was not properly
handled on the property. We do not so find, (See Third Division Awards
12424, 14412, 15383).
The Carrier position on the merits is:
"It is Petitioner's contention that Rule 1--Scope,
Rule 2--Sub-departments, Rule 3--Classes and Rule
5--Seniority support the claim in that respect.
These rules state as follows:
"RULE 1--SCOPE
"These rules govern rates of pay, hours of service,
and working conditions of employes in all subdepartments of the Maintenance of Way and Structures
Department (not including supervisory employes above
the rank of foreman) represented by the Brotherhood
of Maintenance of Way Employes, such as:
Award Number 21701 Page 3
Docket Number W-21422
"(d) Pimping engineers and pumpers (fuel oil
and water).
* ~r
"RULE 2--SUB DEPARTMENTS
"It is understood that the following subdepartments shall be established within the
Maintenance of Way and Structures Department:
Track Sub-department
Bridge and Building Sub-department
Water Service Sub-department
System Work Equipment Sub-department
Track Welding Sub-department
"Any other sub-departtaent that may hereafter
be established shall be by negotiation between
the General Chairman and the Management.
'R= 3--CLASSES
"Each occupation in the several sub-divisions
shall constitute a class, and be listed by class
in numerical sequence, the lowest number designating
the highest class and the highest number designating
the lowest class. Such sequence shall be determined
by Section (f) of Rule
26.
Any existing occupation
now covered by the current agreement, which is not
listed in Section (f)
of
Rule
26,
shall constitute a
class and be assigned to the proper sub-department,
and shall be subject to inclusion the same as though
it were listed.
"Not later than 10 days following the establishment
of a new class and rate of pay in accordance with the
provisions of Article III of the October 7,
1959,
Mediation Agreement (see Appendix A), the General
Chairman of the organization will be furnished
notification thereof. It is agreed that any award
which might be rendered in accordance with paragraph
(c) (5)
of the October 7,
1959,
Agreement will be
applied retroactively to the date new class and rate
was established.
Award Number 21701 Page 4
Docket Number MW-21422
"RULE 5--SENIORITY
"Seniority Established and Confined to Sub-Department.-(a) Seniority rights of all employes are
sub-department in which employed. Seniority of employes
in all sub-departments shall be shown by classes and each
occupation shall constitute a class. Each class shall be
listed in numerical order beginning with number one (1),
which shall designate the highest class, and the highest
number shall designate the lowest class.
"Seniority in the classes of laborers and helpers shall
begin at the time an employe's pay starts in that class.
Seniority in all other classes shall begin as of the date
the employe is assigned by assignment notice to the class
or as of the date that he qualifies for a class under the
provisions of Rule 8 of this agreement.
"Seniority Districts--(b) Seniority rights of employes
in the B&B, Water Service and Track Sub-departments shall
be restricted to districts having boundaries as follows:
"OREGON DIVISION
1. Eastern District
IMP 770.40 Portland
MP 430.79 east of Ashland
MP 527.00, west of Crescent Lake
2. Western District
MP 319.61, west of Dunsmuir
MP 430.79 east of Ashland
MP 527.00, west of Crescent Lake
MP 336.46, on line to Fernley west
of Flanigan
MP 336.33, connect to W.P.R.R. for
Bridge Track Operation.
"Seniority districts established by this rule will be
changed only by agreement.
"System Work Equipment, Track Welding.--(c) Employes in
the System Work Equipment and Track Welding Sub-departments shall have system seniority.
Award Number 21701 Page 5
Docket Number MW-21422
"System Steel Gangs.--(d) Employes assigned to the
Track Sub-department System Steel Rail Laying Gang
and the Bridge and Building Sub-department Steel Gangs
shall retain and accumulate seniority in their
respective sub-departments and classes on their home
seniority districts.
"Composite Positions.--(e) When composite positions
and wage rates are established, they shall be
established by agreement between the Management and
the General Chairman."
"None of the foregoing agreement provisions cited by
Petitioner establish any particular arrangement or
method designating how work should be performed or
what work is reserved to employes covered by those
rules. Dealing caith the Scope Rule, which is general
in character and which lists positions instead of
delineating work, it is a principle well established
by this Division that a valid claim to disputed work
under such a rule must be determined from history,
tradition and custom, system-wide, from which it can
be established that the employes making claim have
exclusively performed the work. Further the burden
of proof of such exclusivity throughout Carrier's
property rests with the party making the claim. See
Awards 5702, 7583, 7806, _8831, 9565, 9602, 10080,
10389, 11054, 11129, 11581, 11846, 11847, 12774,
12972, 13161, 13364, 13579, 14022, 14159, 16068,
17943, 17961, 17962, 19190, 19761, and 20421, all of
which involve interpretation of the Scope Rule here
in issue." (Underlining the Carriers)
The other pertinent rule in this dispute is Rule 26, parts of
which are as follows:
"RULE 26--BASIS OF COMPENSATION
"Included in Agreement.--(a) The rates of pay of
employes covered by this agreement shall be listed in
a master wage schedule included herein (See Mediation
Agreement of October 7, 1959, Appendix A).
"Position Omitted.--(b) Any established position and
rate of pay which may have been omitted shall be
recognized and included in this agreement.
Award Number 21701 Page 6
Docket Number MW-21422
"Rates Paid.--(c) Employes shall be paid a monthly
or.hourly rate of pay.
"Montly-Rated Positions.--(d) Employes filling
monthly ratedpositions shall be compensated on a
monthly rate based on 175-1/3 hours per month.
The monthly rate shall apply in each month regardless
of its working hours.
"In event less than. a month is worked or a month's
work is split between two or more employes on the
same job carrying a monthly rate, compensation due
shall be figured pro rata on the regular working hours
in the month concerned.
"Determining Hourly Rate.--(e) To compute the hourly
rate of monthly rated employes, divide the monthly
rate by 175-1/3 hours.
(f) CLASS AND WAGE SCHEDULE
* * t
"Water Service-Sub-Department
Basic Rate Effective 1-1-74
Monthly Hourly Hourly
No. Class Rate Equivalent Rate
11 Pumpers
.
4.5821
'-.Water Service
Mechanic
(Welder) 5.3665
Student
Foreman 946.50 5.3983"
The cause of the complaint was the unilateral removal of specific
work from assignment by Claimant, who the Carrier admits on the record had
performed the work at the point and location.
The Carrier asserts it is, under the Agreement, its prerogative
to assign this work to someone outside unless under the Agreement it can
be shown under the Scope Rule alone that jurisdiction of disputed work must
be determined from "history, tradition and custom, systemwide' the work is
exclusively the Organization's "exclusively throughout Carrier's property"
(underlining Carrier's). The Board does not interpret the Agreement or the
Award Number 21701 Page 7
Docket Number MW-21422
Awards so narrowly for to do so would leave a part of the agreement of
great importance without meaning. We agree:
"In determining the ultimate question as presented
herein, the Agreement must be read as a whole, and
any interpretation obtained, should if possible, be
consistent with the rest of the agreement." (Third
Division Award 11165).
I
Reading the agreement as a whole, we have a comprehensive view
of the work and the jurisdiction, the Agreement rules cover "Pumping
engineers and pumpers (fuel oil and water)", Rule 1--Scope; sub-departments are defined including Wa
seniority was defined and seniority districts established by Agreement
including by definition the district in which the work at issue was
performed, (Rule 5, Seniority); a basis of compensation with wage rates
and class for 'Pumpers' was set forth, (Rule 26--Basis of Compensation).
I,
-"Our function is to
interpret and
apply the Agreement
in light of the peculiar fact of the record and not to
expostulate and.interpolate other Awards." (Third
Division Award 13326). j
Under this set of facts where it is admitted the work involved had been
performed, traditionally and customarily by the Water Service employes ac
the location here involved to do other than rule this was the
Organization's work and not transferable without agreement by the
Organization would do violence to the Agreement.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole
record and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute
are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway
Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;
I
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction
over the dispute involved herein; and j
That the Agreement was violated.
I
I
Award Number 21701 Page 8
Docket Number MW-21422
A W A R D
Claims sustained.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
ATTEST:
Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 29th day of September 1977.
CEA
I
~V
7
SE
P
i