NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number
W-21779
Irwin M. Lieberman, Referee
(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Company
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood
that:
(1) The discipline of Trackman H. Richard for alleged
'violation of Rules
176, 177
and
189'
was without just and sufficient
cause and on the basis of unproven charges (System File B-11169).
(2)
The claimant's personal record be cleared of the charges
placed against him and reimbursement be made for all wage loss suffered
all in accordance with Rule 1(d) of Article 1+.
OPINION OF BOARD: This is a discipline dispute in which Claimant was
dismissed for sleeping on the job and subsequently
reinstated. The dispute turns on the question of whether or not there
was sufficient evidence to support the Carrier's determination of guilt.
The record of the investigation reveals that Claimant denied
he was asleep on the day in question, when he had an assignment to ride
in a truck and watch the crossings out of the right side of the vehicle.
He admitted that he was "scooted down" and his head was back. Two
witnesses testified that he was asleep, one indicating that he was
hunched down in the seat with his hat over his eyes. This conflict in
the testimony is not within cur province to resolve, it must be accomplished by the hearing officer
hearing officer credited the two company witnesses and not Claimant.
In view of that determination, there was sufficient evidence to support
Carrier's conclusion of Claimant's guilt. The prior record of Claimant
was properly considered in determining the measure of discipline to be
imposed. There is no basis for overturning Carrier's decision in this
case. The Claim must be denied.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole
record and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
Award Number 21708 Page 2
Docket Number MW-21779
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute
are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway
Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction
over the dispute involved herein; and
That the Agreement was not violated.
A W A R D
Claim denied.
NATIONAL
RAILROID ADJUSTMRHT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
ATTEST:
Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 29th day of September 1977.
G_ 7 1e77
GOT J. eE P