NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number CL-21879
(Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and
( Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers,
( Express and Station Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Consolidated Rail Corporation
( (Former Lehigh Valley Railroad Company)
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood
(GL-8239) that:
(a) The Carrier violated the Rules Agreement, effective
May 1, 1955, particularly Rules 27, 28, 29, 30, 31 and 32, when it
assessed discipline of Dismissal on R. G. Klepacki, Clerk, East Claremont
Yard, New Jersey.
(b) Claimant Klepacki's record be cleared of the charges
brought against him on March 12, 1975.
(c) Claimant Klepacki be restored to service with seniority
and all other rights unimpaired, and be compensated for wage loss sustained in accordance with the p
6 per cent (6%) per annum, compounded daily. Claimant also to be made
whole for any money he was required to spend for medical and hospital
services, or other benefits which would otherwise have been covered
under Traveler's Group Policy GA-23000.
OPINION OF BOARD: This is a discipline case involving the discharge
of a clerical employe charged with failure to
comply with rules in published tariffs and failure to protect Carrier's
revenues. The charge is essentially one of dishonesty in that no
demurrage charges had been assessed against certain shippers, records
had been falsified and Claimant had received "monetary consideration"
from the shippers.
We have reviewed the record carefully, and are convinced that
Claimant's investigation rights, provided by the agreement, were satisfied.
The charges in this case were extremely serious, involving,as
they do, fidelity and honesty to the employer. In one instance the
demurrage charges amounted to $40,950 which were never reported and
for which Claimant said he received a "bundle." The Carrier cannot be
expected to retain employes in its service who manifest such a callous
Award Number 21711 Page 2
Docket Number CL-21879
disregard for their employment relationship. The record fully supports
the discipline assessed in this case, and there were no facts presented
in mitigation of the penalty.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole
record and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral 'hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute
are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway
Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction
over the dispute involved herein; and
The Agreement was not violated.
A W A R D
Claim denied.
OCT 2 7 1977
J J SEP' P
NATIONAL. RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
ATTEST:
Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 29th day of September 1977.