NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number CL-21671
James F. Scearce, Referee
(Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and
( Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers,
( Express and Station Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Norfolk and Western Railway Company
STATE'= OF CIALM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood,
GL-8127, that:
1. Carrier violated and continues to violate the Agreement
between the parties when on February
17, 1974,
a new position of
Assistant Office Manager was created as a fully excepted position with
clerical duties assigned, which had previously been performed by clerical
employes at Buffalo, New York.
2. Carrier shall pay A. Valente eight (8) hours punitive rate
for February
17, 1974,
and each Sunday thereafter until July 1,
19',5,
when the work was returned to contract employes.
OPINION OF BOARD: This claim arises out of the reassignment by Carrier
of a supervisory position from the night shift
(12 Midnight to 8:00 A.M.) to the day shift (8:00 A.M. to
4:00
P.M.).
Petitioner alleges that on the day shift the supervisor performed certain
duties such as tracing cars, making reports, general office duties, etc.,
which should have been performed by clerical employes.
Our review of the record submitted to this Board by petitioner
reveals that it contains little more than unsubstantiated allegations and -.
assertions. Petitioner has offered no proof that any of the items of work
were, in fact, performed by the supervisory employe. The Carrier, on the
other hand, denied that the supervisory employe performed any service
which accrued exclusively to clerical employes. Petitioner, in its ab
breviated rebuttal to the Board did nothing to refute the Carrier's asser
tions of fact thereby leaving material factual statements uncontroverted
and undenied.
Given the paucity of evidence brought forth by petitioner on the
essential points of `its claim, we have no alternative but to conclude
Award Number 21789 Page 2
Docket Number CL-21671
that the record does not support its claim. In order to prevail in
this case, petitioner was required to establish its claim by a preponderance of probative evidence.
dismiss the claim for failure of proof.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole
record and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute
are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the iailiray
Labor Act, as approved June 21,
1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction
over the dispute involved herein.; and
That the Agreement was not violated.
A W P_ R D
Claim dismissed.
PIATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTi "v'T BQ:RD
By Order of Third Division
ATTEST:
Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, tMs 18th day of November 1977.
CECO11977
J J BERG