_2,1_iA='.°. .'J ___G='i -e_ V =C

nF

71



.L___.._ vi Oi2.;,2C

'Wl~_ '_,W; _- r vst _ -n7C. in

i__o-e -oil




IT (














.-!so ,yer^ane are _n.._-a._._ duties of hssistar_t -ile %ler-:ReCOrd Clerk (yo-551) and the whole o_' the duties of Stenograp:er .:C. I (TR-j~=) a5 _'0110'.·75:


















The Carrier argues that it did blank: the job; that t^e duties
of op=en inrc, sorting a--id processing are performed variously throughout the
s:ys term and the assig=.-Ien t i this case to a ig er paid em nlcy ee (as is
the Stenographer ::e. 1) does not 'rioiate tile blan~'ng cf the job.

:·ie think -ot. In defining the roles for -..,. Stenographer No. _ and Assistant File Clerk-Record filer, there i·Tas obvi'ousl'y reason to draw t_=a lines of demarcation between functions attendent to those nOSi.tionS. Nothin° in the Stenograp:,er _`:0. 1 duties C8__ be construed. to Cover t.^_e mail processina functions; on the other hand, the Ass-istaat ·ile ClerkRecord C1erh's duties in reserving the functions of a position to that position. We find merit to tie Orcanization's claim and Rule 11 ma=kes clear that such duties 1Tould cover the entire eight-hour period. Thus, the Clai..ant's request for eight hollrs'pa'J is ordered.

1'_'MI_',,GS: -he Third Division of upon t^.. `.;_: ~uStment 30ar,'-.

        record and a, l __... evidence, finds and hods


        That the parties :;aired oral hearing;


        That the Carrier a^.d t'.^.e E~mployes ;_-;ol,;ed i_ t=is _a^ate

        t_ ._

are respec _ve_y :ar__,._ and :·rit^,t:_e ..ea:.i^ o_° -U._·e ?a=_:.-ay
_ _,
Labor Act, as approved J;L.e 2_1, 1S·-1>
The claim is sustained as stated in the Opinion.

~T"- EST
          .-secut_·r<_ Secretary


fa-.ec a~ __=coo, ____

18th ca,- o=' November 1977.