NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION
George S. Roukis, Referee
21801
Docket Number CL-21606
(Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and
{ Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers,
{ Express and Station Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE: (
(R. C. Haldeman, Trustee of the Property
{ of Lehigh Valley Railroad Company, Debtor
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood,
GL-$080, that:
{a} Carrier violated the Scope, Rule 1 of the May 1, 1955
Rules Agreement between the parties and Rules of the National Vacation
Agreements in refusing to allow R. A. Bittenbender two {2} weeks
vacation pay in 1975 based upon his service during the calendar year,
1 9 74 .
(b) Carrier be required to compensate Mr. Bittenbender far
two {2} weeks vacation at the rate of his former Programmer position..
In a letter dated September 27, 1974, Claimant
tendered his resignation from the Carrier and
asked that his 1975 vacation, based upon his 1974 service, be allowed.
His request for vacation pay was denied on the theory that payment in
lieu of vacation was not warranted because Claimant was assigned to a
"P" position,
involving the
The identical question was decided in our Award 14360
same parties where it was held:
"Although Mr. Harvey's 'P' position was partially
excepted from the working rules of the Agreement,
his position was covered by Rule 1, the Scope of
the Agreement. Thus, the Brotherhood represented
him along with all members subject to the Scope
of the Agreement when it negotiated amendments to
the National Vacation Agreement in August, 1960.
Moreover, since these amendments did not designate
any exceptions, this National Vacation Rule
applies to partially-excepted employe, qtr. Harvey,
and he is entitled to vacation pay for 1961 for
services he had rendered during 1960 and prior
years."
Award Number 21801 Page 2
Docket Number CL-21606
See, also, Award 21509 involving these same parties.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole
record and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute
are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway
Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction
over the dispute involved herein; and
The agreement was violated.
A W A R D
Claim sustained.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
ATTEST:
Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 30th day of November 1977.