NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number MW-?1919
James r^: Scearce, Referee
i
(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Company
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood
that:
(1) The suspension of Trackman G. F. Bahr for the period
extending from October 13 through October 24, 1975 was without just and
sufficient cause and on the basis of charges which were disproven at as
investigation conducted on November 12, 1975 (System File B-1525).
(2) Trackman G. F. Bahr shall now be allowed the benefits
prescribed in Agreement Rule
91
(b)
(6).
OPINION OF BOARD: Provisions applicable to this case are as follows:
Rule 713 - Maintenance of Way and Structures
"If physically able, an employe injured on duty must report
the injury to his foreman or other supervisory officer before leaving
company premises.
"A report must be made of every injury, regardless of how
slight. The supervisory officer should arrange prompt first-aid for
the injured person, then place him under care of medical doctor as
soon as possible, reporting the injury promptly on prescribed forms
regardless of how minor it may appear."
Rule
91
(a)
(6)
Discipline Rule. Agreement between
the Parties
"If the charge against the employe is not sustained, it shall
be stricken from the record. If by reason of such unsustained charge the
employe has been removed from position held, reinstatement will be made
and payment allowed for the assigned working hours actually lost while
out of the service of the Carrier at not less than the rate of pay of
position formerly held, or for the difference in rate of pay earned if in
the service, less any amount earned in other employment."
Award Number
21822
Page
2
Docket Number
b1W-21919
It has been established that the Claimant made his foreman
aware of his complaint with a sore shoulder no later than 7hursday,
September
18, 1975.
It is also apparent that the foreman considered
it as part of a general complaint by the entire gang relative to
"aches and pains." The record indicates that a witness to the discussion corroborated the Claimant's
problem on Wednesday, September
17, 1975.
This same witness was present
on Friday morning, September
19, 1975,
when the Claimant informed the
foreman that he was going to the doctor that afternoon.
In a discipline case, the duty rests upon the Carrier to establish the basis for just cause in i
the burden of proof is on the Carrier to show that the Claimant failed to
meet the requirements of appropriate rules or regulations to report an
injury.
A reading of the record evidences somewhat confusing and con
tradictory testimony by all of those directly involved. What seems
obvious, however, is that the Claimant did endeavor to make his problem
known, did inform the foreman of his intent to go see a doctor, and did
show up on Friday morning, September
19, 1975,
at the facility to com
plete whatever forms were appropriate in this regard. Such efforts were
corroborated by a witness, whose testimony, though flawed in places,
stands the test of credibility. The Carrier bases its case upon the im
precision of the Claimant's notification of his need and intent to consult
a physician, instead of. establishing a positive rationale for its own
actions.
We are satisfied that the Claimant sufficiently met his obligation to notify in this case, as re
713.
We are not satisfied that the Carrier has established just cause for its disciplinary
actions. The Claim shall be resolved as per the provisions of Rule
91
(b)
(6).
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole
record and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Pnployes involved in this dispute
are respectively Carrier and r.'~ployes within the meaning of the Railway
Labor Act, as approved June
21, 1934;
Award Number 21822 Page
3
Docket Number tea-21919
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction
over the dispute involved herein; and j
The Agreement was violated.
A W A R D
The Claim sustained in accordance with Opinion.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
ATTEST:
r"
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 16th day of December 1977.