(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes PARTIES TO DISPUTE: (Southern Pacific Transportation Company ( (Pacific Lines)



(1) The Agreement was violated when, on June 6, 7 and 8, 1973, other than Water Service Sub-department employes were used to repair an air conditioner unit at Sparks, Nevada (System File '6ofW 152-785).

(2) ZTater Service Mechanic A. Afydin be allowed twenty-four (24) hours' pay at his straight-tine rate account of the aforesaid violation.

OPINION OF BOARD: The Employes assert that on the claim dates, an
air cc.-.aitioner unit was repaired by Electrical
Department Employes, rather than Water Service Sub-department Employes.
The Organization contends that a historical separation of work between
the crafts results in electrical work on air conditioners being
performed by Electrical forces and all other work performed by Water
Service forces.

We have token into account the Parties' contentions regarding Rule hi '190, as well as their assertions concerning prior work performance. The scope clause before us is general in nature and consequently, it order to prevail, the Employes are required to prove,'to our satisfaction, a historical work custom, to the exclusion of others;-.on a.'systemwide basis. Our extensive review of the record fails to convince us that such a burden has been satisfied.







That the Carrier and the E-ployes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved Tune
_ That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and

        That the Agreement was not violated.


                  A W A R D


      ` Claim dismissed.


                        EATIORAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD

                        By Order of Third Division


ATTEST: Secretary

Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 15th day of February 1978.

                                ~',_C=I V' O

                                ( MAR 0 71978

                                J `~ BER'V P