NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number CL-21867
Irwin M. Lieberman, Referee
(Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and
( Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers,
( Express and Station Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Western Pacific Railroad Company
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of
the
System Committee of the Brotherhood
GL-8280, that:
1. The Western Pacific Railroad Company violated the current
Clerks'
Agreement when on
November 5, 1975 it arbitrarily and
discriminately dismissed from its service K. J. Jaskala without advice
of the precise charge or charges against him and without proper
justification. The decision of
the Carrier
was based not on the
specific charges, but on operating rules never mentioned in the
specific charges.
2.
The
Carrier shall now returnMr. K. J. Jaskala to service
with pay for all time lost and with all
other rights
unimpaired and
clear
his
record of all charges arising from the investigation conducted
on October 27, 1975.
3. The Western Pacific Railroad Company shall now be required
to allow Mr. K. J. Jaskala eight hours' pay for each date held out of
service since and including November 5, 1975, including subsequent wage
increases and other benefits
as reflected by the Carrier's payroll
and
other records.
OPINION OF BOARD: Claimant was dismissed from Carrier's
service
November 5, 1975 following an investigation held
on October 27, 1975. Petitioner's claim is based on two contentions:
that the charge in this dispute was not precise (as compared to the
Carrier's ultimate findings) and that there was no proof of Claimant's
guilt.
Claimant was charged as follows:
"Arrange to attend a formal investigation ....to
determine facts and place your responsibility,
for your alleged unauthorized absence from duty
approximately 12 Noon to 3:00 P.M. or October 20,
1975, and for your failure to protect your
assignment on October 21, 1975."
Award Number 21,018 . Page 2
Docket Number CL-21867
It is noted that at the investigation there was no complaint by
Claimant or his representatives regarding the precise nature of the
charges. Following the investigation Claimant received a notice from
the Carrier which stated, in pertinent part:
"Refers to formal investigation held with you
as Principal ....to determine facts and place
your responsibility for your alleged
unauthorized absence from duty approximately
12 Noon to 3:00 P.M. on October 20, 1975, and
for your failure to protect your assignment on
October 21, 1975.
Testimony in this investigation developed that
the charges were sustained.
Please be advised therewith that you are dismissed
from the service of the Western Pacific Railroad
Company for your violation of Western Pacific
Operating Rules 706, 707 and 711
...."
We do not agree with Petitioner's position with respect to
the charges. It is clear that Claimant was charged with two precise
infractions and was found to be guilty of those same charges by
Carrier's letter following the investigation. The fact that the
particular infractions could be interpreted to be violations of
certain Carrier operating rules, which were not initially cited,
is not material. Carrier's notification of the charges and ultimate
finding in no way prejudiced Claimant's ability to mount a defense;
he was not misled, nor was he deceived (see Award 1144.3).
A study of the transcript of the investigation indicates that
there was substantial evidence to support Carrier's conclusions as to
Claimant's guilt; in fact~Claimant's own testimony constituted a
virtual admission of guilt. It is not our function to substitute our
judgment for that of Carrier in the determination of the appropriate
penalty for a disciplinary infraction unless the discipline may be
characterized as discriminatory, arbitrary or capricious. In this
dispute, particularly in view of Claimant's past record of discipline
and letters of reprimand for related misconduct, we find no basis for
disturbing the measure of discipline imposed.
Award Number
21918
Page 3
Docket Number CL-21867
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole
record and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute
are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway
Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction
over the dispute involved herein; and
That the Agreement was not violated.
A W A R D
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
ATTEST:
Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 28th day of Februa=".7
1978.