NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
Z RD DIVI-7
- T
-at " er -L-211~-,20
Herbert L. :-:arm, Jr., Referee
(Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and
( Steamship Clerks, Freight Fandlers,
( Express and Station 3mpl 4es
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Southern Rail:aay Company
ST.4T_--r7T OF CLAI.'d: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood
GL-327u
that:
(a) Carrier violated the Agreement at Charlotte, ,worth
Carolina,
:Then it dismissed exH. 1':. vandle, Clerk at Air Line
.unction, -'TOrth Carolina from the service of t^e Carrier for allegedly lea'iing h_a assignment as
p.=1.,
t:pril ic~,
1970 without permission or aut.,orilv.
(b) Carrier she',--, be required to compensate ?r.
ri.
__.
°andle for all time lost includin_any overtime he may have stood
for, at to rate of
his
assierment, beginning April 210, 1975, and
continuinr_ until he is restored to the service of the Carrier with
seniority and all ri __his uzimpai=·ed.
O_I7UC?I OF BGARD: Claimant was dismissed from service for leaving
his assignment without permission or authority.
This occurred shortly after the start of tae ;cork assignment.
Claima.at, at the time and later, :.ad no acceptable explanation for
his sudden urexcused departure.
A full, fair and impartial investigative hearing was
can ducted by the Carrier. mot: =n_ in t^e testimony develo_ced at t:e
-earin g nor __. t.-,e factual baC_C;rol='ld _Vez rise to
2.:.y
reason for
this Board t7 question the Carrier
nS
disciplinary action .
....~=_e .:e venally
inv`.A,3 . ?.s J='
the most severe _.atur -_= e
Carrier pro7erl;;r' considered past similar offenses in
I.._
Clai_ast'z
..C:
= record inuidi: _ its '~.is:-issa_ action.
Award ?dumb°r 21920
Page
2
Docket
:n:fber CL-21920
,T'?DIlTGS: 'The Third Division of to Adjustment Board, after givi^-
t'-a parties to this dispute due notice of hearing thereor,
and upon the -whole record and all the evidence, finds a-:d holds
That the Carrier and the 4 ployes _voived in this dispute
are respectively Carrier and F~ployes ;within the meaninof the tail7ay
Labcr Act, as approved June 21,
late;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdict._mover the dispute involved '..^.erein;
That the A-areement :-Tas not violated.
A '·7 A H
Claim denied.
YATIGi·AL RAILRCAD ADJUST:--T
T~
BC4RD
3y Order o= Third Division
m, t
_cecutive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 28th day of Februaz^f 1978.
~;'RR
Ilk
13 1070
J BER'~ P