NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUST14ENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number CL-21903
(Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and Steamship
( Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express and
( Station Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(The Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood,
(GL-8286) that:
1. Carrier violated the Agreement between the parties when
on the dates of June 14, 15, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29;
July 2, 3, 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 23, 24, 25,
26, 27, 28, 30, 31; August 1, 2; September 18, 19, 25, 26; October 2,
3; December 18 and 19, 1973, it caused and permitted employes not
covered thereby to use a telephone from Baum Boulevard, West Schenley,
Pennsylvania, for the purpose of securing location of train information and holding trains for the p
the Mosites Construction Company, and
2. Carrier shall, as a result, compensate the named employes
eight (8) hours pay for each date listed as follows:
(a) K. M. Doerschner - June 14, 15, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22,
25, 26, 27, 28, 29; July 2, 3, 5,
6, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 16, 17, 18,
19, 20, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28,
30, 31; August 1 and 2, 1973.
(b) G. R. Keeney -September 18, 19, 25, 26; October 2,
3; December 18 and 19, 1973.
OPINION of BOARD: The issue presented herein involves the application
of Rule 66 of the June 4,
1973
Clerk-Telegrapher
Agreement.
The blosites Construction Company entered into a contract with
the State of Pennsylvania to repair a State highway bridge, located 250
feet above the tracks of the Carrier. The work of the contractor was in
no way related to the operations of the Carrier, and there was no
necessity for the construction company to have contact with the Carrier
in order to perform under the contract t-rith the State.
Award Number 21946 Page 2
Docket Number CL-21903
The Carrier urges that it utilized a trainman (flagman)
to advise the Carrier if debris fell onto the tracks from the
construction area. It is further asserted that the trainman used the
telephone on occasion to determine if a train were approaching, so
that he might be more vigilant. The Carrier denies that the use of
the telephone was in any way related to the location of trains for
the protection of the workmen or equipment of the construction company.
Third Division Award 21786 and the award in Docket No. 87
of Special Board of Adjustment No. 355 are both cited as authority for
denial of the claim presented herein.
We agree with the position of the Carrier and the awards
cited in reference thereto.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole
record and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute
are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway
Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction
over the dispute involved herein; and
That the Agreement was not violated.
~Z:~=-..~--='w'`
A W A R D
MAR 2 7 1970
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD AD
J eE
OAR
JUS D
By Order of Third Division
ATTEST:
PA
-,-/,I -
Exe utive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 15th day of March 1978.