NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number CL-21881
Herbert L. Marx, Jr., Referee
(Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and
( Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers,
( Express and Station Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Consolidated Rail Corporation
( (Former Penn Central Transportation Company)
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood
(GL-8246) that:
(a) The Carrier violated the Rules Agreement, effective
July 1, 1965, particularly Rule 6-A-1, in that W. B. Clark, regularly
assigned block operator, Overbrook Tower, 3:00 P.M. to 11:00 P.M.,,
rest days Tuesday and Wednesday, rate of pay $6.477 per hour, was
unjustly dismissed for being absent from duty on Sunday, August 17, 1975.
(b) Clark was not given a fair and impartial trial, and the
discipline was assessed in an arbitrary, capricious and discriminatory
manner. Clark should now be restored to service with seniority and all
other rights unimpaired and be compensated for all time lost since
September 1, 1975. Clark should also be made whole for all medical
expenses incurred while dismissed, which medical: expenses would have
been covered by Travelers Group Policy GA-23000.
OPINION OF BOARD: Claimant was a regularly assigned Block Operator
who, as of August 1975, had approximately four
years' service.
On August 17, 1975, Claimant was expected to protect his
assignment from 3:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m., and there is no question but
that he failed to do so, although he telephoned the proper office twice:
first, to advise that he would be late, and the second time, to advise
that he would be so late that he would "mark off."
Claimant's discipline history, considered by Carrier after
hearing and proof of Claimant's failure. properly to protect his assignment on August 17, 1975, appe
was disciplined for failure to protect his assignment on August 8, 1975,
and failure to report on time for his assignment on August 9, 1975. -
Award Number
21948
Page 2
Docket Number CL-21881
The instance of August 17, 1975, is thus the third in a series of such
instances during Claimant's employment -- all occurring within a ten-day
period.
The Board concurs that Carrier properly concluded that Claimant
was deserving of discipline and that disciplinary action is, and should
be, intended to have a remedial effect on employes. The Board does not
agree, however, that Carrier can properly conclude that the discipline
administered for the August 8 and 9 incidents proved that it did not
have the desired results, since the disciplinary suspension had not yet
been served by the Claimant.
Claimant's obligations to the Carrier are spelled out by the
Carrier as:
"Claimant had a distinct obligation to the Carrier
either to report at his scheduled reporting time and
fulfill his assignment or to notify his supervisor of
his inability to do so sufficiently is advance of his
scheduled reporting time so that a replacement could
report on time . . ."
The Board concurs with that statement and includes it here so
that Claimant might understand the Board's agreement therewith.
The Board holds that the discipline imposed has served its
purpose and should be modified to a suspension and will order that
Claimant be returned to service with all rights restored but without
payment for anything during the period of suspension.
As in Award No. 21346 of this Division, Claimant should understand, without any question, that i
obligation to the Carrier and that this Board's decision can be classed
as giving Claimant "one last chance" to become and remain a responsible
employe.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole
record and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
Award Number
21948
Page 3
Docket Number CL-21881
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute
are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway
Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction
over the dispute involved herein; and
That the discipline imposed was excessive.
A W A R D
The claim is sustained only to the extent that the dismissal
is set aside. Claimant shall be restored to service with retention of
seniority and other rights, but without reimbursement for compensation
or expenses incurred during the period of suspension.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
ATTEST:
PA"oae
Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 15th day of March
1978.