NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number CL-21940
George S. Roukis, Referee
(Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and
( Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers,
( Express and Station Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Consolidated Rail Corporation
( (Former Lehigh Valley Railroad Company)
STATEMENT OF CLAM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood
GL-8289, that:
(a) Carrier violated the Rules Agreement, effective May 1,
1955, particularly Rules 1,
3,
7 and 9 among others, when it assigned
the work of checking and weighing cars and preparing weight tickets
at Perth Amboy, New Jersey to employes of the Yardmasters' craft.
(b) Carrier now be required to compensate Clerk P. M.
Trischitta for one day's pay at the applicable pro rata rate for the
date of February 20,
1975
and all subsequent dates on which said
violation occurred.
OPINION OF BOARD: This dispute pertains to the assignment of
certain work to Yardmasters which consisted
of weighing cars and preparing weight tickets at Perth Amboy, New
Jersey on the second trick. It is contended that the clerical position
formerly assigned to perform this work was abolished on May
4,
1973.
Carrier does not directly challenge Claimant's factual assertion, but
argues instead that:
"The work of weighing cars and preparing
weight tickets, which consumes less than
fifteen (15) minutes' time per trick, has
never been an exclusive function of clerks
on the property but has been performed by
others, including, as in this case, Yardmasters."
Award Number 22011 Page 2
Docket Number CL-21940
The Scope Rule in question reads, in part, as follows:
"Positions or work coming under the scope
of this agreement shall not be removed and
transferred to employes coming under the
scope of another agreement (except is the
case of reduction of clerical forces to
establish a one man agency) except by mutual
agreement."
This rule was interpreted by the Board in Award 13807
(Referee Kornblum). We stated therein, "it roust be assumed that work
which is regularly assigned to a clerical position under the Agreement
is work coming under the Scope of the Agreement (even if not exclusively
under it), and therefore, when that position is abolished the duties
remaining must be assigned to another clerical position at the location
coming under the Agreement, save in the exception expressly described
(reduction to a one man agency)." We do not think its specifications
and coverage requirements are inapplicable to the particulars of this
case.
Therefore, Part (a) of the claim is sustained. Conversely,
Carrier argues that only fifteen
(15)
minutes per trick is consumed
in the performance of this work, thus the claim in part (b) is upheld
for fifteen
(15)
minutes at the applicable pro rata rate, on the second
trick, for each date that the disputed work was assigned to a Yardmaster.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole
record and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute
are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway
Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction
over the dispute involved herein; and
That the Agreement was violated.
Award Plumber
22011
Page
3
Docket Plumber
CL-21940
A W A
R
D
Claim sustained in accordance with the Opinion of the Board.
PIATIONAL RAILROAD
ADJUSTMMiT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
ATTEST:
Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 14th day cff April
1978.